This scenario best exemplifies the "false consensus" effect.
The false consensus effect happens when we overestimate the quantity of other individuals (or degree to which other individuals) share our sentiments, convictions, and practices. In this way, once in a while people have a tendency to trust that others are more like them than is really the case.
Oral evidence to ""fill in the gaps"" of a contract with incomplete terms can be introduced at a trial. The statement is true .
At a trial, oral testimony can be used to "fill in the gaps" of a contract with omitted clauses. Any agreement that is not in writing is null and void according to the Statute of Frauds. Ordinarily, an oral agreement that is supposed to be in paper is void.
Oral evidence can be shown by a witness who was present when they occurred or by a recording of the agreement at the time it occurred. This could be the proof that a person offers to support their claim. Oral agreements are dangerous and unsafe since one never knows when someone will retract their own claims.
To learn more about oral evidence here
brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
Answer:
a) spontaneous recovery
Explanation:
In classical conditioning, the term spontaneous recovery is defined as the reappearance of the conditioned response after a rest period or period of lessened response. In other words, the conditioned response is back after it was thought to have disappeared.
In this example, Marjoe trained his dog that whenever it saw a photo of the cat next door, he'd receive a treat. The dog was conditioned to <u>start salivating (conditioned response)</u> whenever he saw the<u> photo of the cat (conditioned stimulus). </u>Then Marjoe extinguished the conditioned response by presenting the photo without the treat. However, <u>a week later, when he hold up the photo of the cat, the dog started to salivate</u>.
That is, <u>he came up with the conditioned response after a rest period, </u>so he presented the response when Marjoe thought it had disappeared.
Thus, this is an example of spontaneous recovery.
<u>Note: </u>
<u>b) Stimulus discrimination refers to the capacity to recognize one specific stimulus among others.</u>
<u>c) Stimulus generalization refers to the fact that the response appears with similar stimulus but not with only one (the dog would salivate with any picture of cats)</u>
By virtue of their familiarity in a foreign country or region, IGOs and NGOs are a valuable source of information for a Joint Task Force commander who may have neither access to nor current information about the affected country or region.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
NGOs and IGOs are sources of information when certain forces do not tend to have the same. NGOs and IGOs are known for collecting information about the affected country or region. They consist of specialized people who have a better understanding or idea of what kind of data they are going to collect.
Although they tend to collect such data, they hardly disclose the same as it is for their purpose. Moreover, it is difficult to rely on data published by the government due to a lack of accuracy.
Answer: Possession processing
Explanation:
The possession processing is basically refers to the various types of tangible action for the products and the services and different types of other physical possessions that are belongs to the consumers or the users.
According to the given service processes context, Tina is providing the various types of services such as maintaining the gardens, planting and also designing the new garden that comes under the category of possessions processing.
Therefore, Possessions processing is the correct answer.
