Answer:
$5572500
Explanation:
consolidated cost of goods sold for 2020 would be:
consolidated cost of goods sold = ( total of goods sold by bought company ) - ( intra-entity transfer ) + ( ending unrealized gross profit ) - ( beginning unrealized gross profit )
= ( 5400000 + 1200000 ) - ( 1000000 )+(1000000*20%)*20% - {(650000*15%)*(450000/650000)}
= 6600000 - 1040000 - ( 97500 * 45/65 )
= $5572500
Answer:
10.45%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the cost of debt
B/S = 1.57 − 1
B/S = .57
.156 = .14 + .57(1 −.21)(.14 − RB)
.156 = .14 + .57(.79)(.14 − RB)
RB = .1045*100
RB= 10.45%
Therefore the cost of debt is 10.45%
Answer:
Explanation:
Because land never depreciates, Western Bank & Trust wanted to distribute a higher percentage of the purchase price to the building, rather than the land. By allocating 90% of the purchase price to the building, rather than a more accurate 70%, Western Bank & Trust increases the depreciation amount of the building each year. For tax purposes, the IRS requires that the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) be used as the depreciation method used by companies. Under this method, the IRS specifies the useful life for a specific asset. MACRS also ignores residual value of an asset at the end of its useful life. By stating that the building was worth 90% of the total purchase price, Western Bank is attempting to increase its tax deduction from the IRS, because only the building depreciates, not the land. This improper allocation of the total purchase amount violates GAAP principles, which require that accounting information be “relevant and have faithful representation.” The information must be “complete, neutral, and free from error” (Nobles, Mattison, & Matsumura, 2014). For Western Bank to provide complete, neutral, and free from error information, it should record the transaction honestly: 70% to the building, 30% to the land. This dishonest representation is harmful to the federal government in that it is allowing Western Bank to take more money than what it is owed. If these kinds of situations happen on a large scale, it could have a huge impact on the economy in general. Source: Nobles, T., Mattison, B., & Matsumura, E. M. (2014). Horngren's Accounting, 10th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. Student 2
Answer:
$75
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How much must the employee include in income from both these transactions in total
Customer price for property $500
Less: Gross profit (25%*$500) ($125)
($500-$125=$375)
Employee price ($300)
INCOME $75
($375-$300)
Customer price for service $150
Less: (20%*$150)max exclusion (30)
($150-$30=$120)
Employee price 120
INCOME 0
($120-$120=$0)
Therefore the amount that the employee must include in income from both these transactions in total is $75
Answer:
The Answer is A) True
Explanation:
The marginal cost of production and marginal revenue are economic measures used to determine the amount of output and the price per unit of a product that will maximize profits. A rational company always seeks to optimize its profit, and the relationship between marginal revenue and the marginal cost of production helps to find the point at which this occurs. The point at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost maximizes a company's profit.
Cheers!
