1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga_2 [115]
3 years ago
10

The "fossil war" between Cope and Marsh is one of the more bizzare chapters in American science - or science in general. However

it says something about the emerging competitiveness of the "new" sciences and how scientists conduct themselves.
1. Research the origins of this conflict and write a reaction (200-300 words) about this episode.

include in your discussion:

a. Do you think this is typical of science today? Or was this just an abnormal case?

b. Are there any modern examples (within 50 years) of a similar event.

c. With all of its faults - did this chapter of science advance our understanding of the development of life on Earth?

d. What are the scientific value of fossils?

e. Were there any winners and losers here?

Support your position with examples.
Geography
1 answer:
JulsSmile [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer and Explanation:

1. The fossil war among Cope and Marsh prevalently called the bone wars or The Great Dinosaur Rush can be condensed as a time of exceptionally extreme and heartless challenge of fossil chasing.  

This contention between both the researchers began during the 1870s and kept going till the demise of one of the researchers at almost the century's end in 1897. This was viewed as an extremely unusual case around then.  

The primary phase of contention between the two developed during a fossil collection undertaking in New Jersey. This contention started to break down after some time as opposed to settling down.  

On the off chance that may look abnormal from the outset, however this was only the start of such battles.  

a. This may have been an unusual case in those days, yet today it's most certainly not. This is for sure the commonplace of today. Different instances of such competition between different researchers just as established researchers have developed in the ongoing past.  

b. A lot of researchers detested each other previously, be it Nikola Tesla versus Thomas Edison or Senmelweis versus Meigs. One of the cutting edge model incorporates French Scientists versus American Scientists in the disclosure of HIV.  

c. In spite of the fact that them two continued disrespecting one another and even they crushed different locales actually yet, the examples that were accumulated for this situation or period demonstrated to be extremely useful for paleotoloical field.  

d. Fossils have different logical qualities related with them like we think about the terminated creatures like dinosaurs and Various different ammonites , etc through fossils. We can realize to what extent life has existed on earth by examining the fossils.  

e. Well in the event that the inquiry is for the researchers, at that point I would state no. Be that as it may, from the point of view of science the Scientific people group was the obvious winning group here. The different examples gathered gainful for the Scientific people group and the future research works identified with this field.

You might be interested in
There are ____ degrees of longitude each side of the prime meridian.
maxonik [38]
There are 180° degree of longitude on each side of the prime meridians
5 0
3 years ago
Define living and nonliving resources.Include pictures of examples of each. i need help rights now
Free_Kalibri [48]
Living resources are technically renewable, so trees, for example, they are needed for firewood, paper, whatever else we use trees for as a 'resource.'
Nonliving resources would be like coal, something that takes a long time to get there.
6 0
3 years ago
The northern islands of this island group do not have a tropical climate.
weeeeeb [17]
Its the Bahamas

Hope This Helped :)
4 0
3 years ago
When did Fidel Castro become dictator of Cuba?
Vilka [71]

Answer:

February 16, 1959

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The effects of the Industrial Revolution on agriculture can best be seen in which of the following innovations?
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

The effects of the Industrial Revolution on agriculture can best be seen in the invention of mechanized farm equipment.

Explanation:

A is not correct because using animals as labor is an ancient method used in agriculture, and it is also in no way related to the Industrial Revolution.

B is not correct because it represents a planting method that doesn't necesseraly require any help from mechnization.

C is correct because the mechanized equipment is what was introduced in agriculture and propelled it to new levels.

D is not correct because the introduction of hybridized crops has been a result of the development in other spheres.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where are the two warm core eddies located in relation to the main gulf streakm current
    7·1 answer
  • What is one reason why democracies in sub-Saharan Africa tend to be fragile? A. People in sub-Saharan Africa do not have any dem
    12·2 answers
  • Whats a famous landmark / location in Guatemala​
    12·2 answers
  • What is the main difference between sediment deposited by water and sediments deposited by glaciers?
    10·1 answer
  • What two hemispheres is West Virginia in?
    10·1 answer
  • What are 2 factors that define a modern settlement?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the Revolutionary War a problem for Native American tribes?
    12·1 answer
  • Why do air masses form where the air stays in one place for a while?
    11·1 answer
  • Is candy bar a mixture or pure substance​
    8·2 answers
  • What can happen when the earth’s plates slide past each other?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!