The correct answer is D.
The Hippocratic oath is an ancient Greek oath and the first explicit expression of medical ethics. It is still a simbolic ritual for many novel doctors nowadays. It involves promises made by new doctors, for instance, related to confidentiality with the patients (hence, excluding option A) and to the principle of non-maleficence.
This principle of non-maleficence states that it is preferable not to harm the patient to a greater extent, than to do good to him/her. This is established as a barrier to prevent enthusiastic doctors from using treatments only because of trusting on their knowledge and on hunches, without waiting for enough evidence to support their decisions. This is why they can only treat symptoms.
Answer:The United States Constitution defines the structure of the national government and dictates the scope and limitation of its powers. The Constitution is known as “the supreme Law of the Land” and all other laws are measured against it. The application of the articles and amendments of the Constitution comprise constitutional law.
In addition to the United States Constitution, each state has its own constitution and therefore, its own body of constitutional law as well. State constitutions resemble the federal Constitution in that they outline the state government’s structure of legislative, executive and judicial branches as well as contain a bill of rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
recover damages
Explanation:
From the explanation above,we can deduce or conclude that this is a clear case of fraud in which the aforementioned parties which are Don(victim)a and Eve(perpetrator) of this case of fraud.
First and foremost,we should have an idea of what fraud means or connotes-It is an intentional or purposeful act deception by a individual(s) or body as the case may be towards another individual(s) or entity for the purpose of financial or material gains,not minding the medium in which it was portrayed.And it centres around lies,in order to convince or confuse the victim as the case maybe.
So in this case,Eve having lied to Don about having access to a stock-trading algorithm which could multiply an investment and thus,it wasn't so,then Don would have to file a suit and a proof of injury is required to recover damages in order to void the contract and get back money paid earlier on the basis of the contract,instead of affirming the contract because no sort of financial gains were made in the stock-trading transaction.
