Answer: False
Explanation:
Question mentions that even though Worker A and Worker B are both paid the same salary and become less effective as their workload increase, Worker A is still more effective than Worker B.
The optimal allocation therefore would be one where Worker A get more of the 200 units of production than Worker B because they would be able to produce more as they are more effective.
Answer:
A) Behavioural
Explanation:
Behavioral control refers to facts that show whether there is a right to direct or control how the worker does the work. A worker is an employee when the business has the right to direct and control the worker. The business does not have to actually direct or control the way the work is done as long as the employer has the right to direct and control the work.
Answer: The Break-Even Point will reduce from $4,285.71 to $4,125
Explanation:
To get the Break-Even Point we can divide Fixed Assets by the Contribution margin.
The Contribution Margin is the Selling Price minus the Variable Cost.
For Scenario 1 the Break-Even Point will be,
= 15,000 / ( 6 - 2.50)
= $4,285.71
For Scenario 2 the Break-Even Point is,
= 16,500 / 6.5 -2.5
= $4,125
The Break-Even Point for Scenario 2 means that even though the higher Fixed Costs could have led to a higher Break-Even Point, the higher price contributed more than the fixed costs did and led to an ultimately lower Break-Even Point than the first Scenario.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
The answer base on the given scenario would be letter a,
Roger would gain benefits as he was protected from a financial loss as this
insurance covers him financially as the insurance of which premiums he has paid
and were to gain would only make him the person of having to have the benefit
as he is the one who has the insurance covered for him, which is entitled to
his name and that the benefits and offers would be his gain.
