1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gre4nikov [31]
4 years ago
11

Case Study: Capitalization versus Expensing

Business
1 answer:
Solnce55 [7]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Please see attachment

Explanation:

Please see attachment

You might be interested in
Exercise 8.12 Recording purchases with purchase returns and purchases discounts. LO 8-7 Record the following transactions of J.
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

The Journal entries are as follows:

(i) On Apr-01,

Purchases A/c        Dr. $3,850

Freight - In  A/c       Dr. $105

To Accounts Payable - O’Rourke Fabricators                $3,955

(To record Purchased merchandise on account,Invoice 885, 3/10, n/30)

(ii) On Apr-09,

Accounts Payable - O’Rourke Fabricators A/c  Dr. $3,955

To Purchase discount (3,850 x 2%)                                                 $77

To Cash                                                                                              $3,878

(To Record Paid amount due on Invoice 885, Check 457)

(iii) On Apr-15,

Purchases A/c        Dr. $2,100

Freight - In  A/c       Dr. $160

To Accounts Payable - Kroll Company                $2,260

(To record purchased merchandise on account,Invoice 885, 3/10, n/30)

(iv) On Apr-17,

Accounts Payable - Kroll Company A/c    Dr. $135

To Purchases Returns and Allowances                    $135

(To record received Credit Memo 332 for return of damaged merchandise)

(v) On Apr-24,

Accounts Payable - Kroll Company A/c    Dr. $2,125

To Purchase discount [(2,100 - 135 ) x 1%]                                 $19.65

To cash                                                                                         $2,105.35                                      

(To record paid amount due on Invoice 145, Check 470)

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is correct?
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The world intellectual property organization requires that e-businesses comply with the laws of ________.
vampirchik [111]

The world intellectual property organization requires that the e-business comply with the laws of the country in which they are based because of the reason that the e-commerce company should comply with the laws of its own or home country which is simplified by the WIPO.

5 0
3 years ago
Lindsay​ Electronics, a small manufacturer of electronic research​ equipment, has approximately 6 comma 800 items in its invento
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

100 items need to be counted each day.

Explanation:

Of the 6,800 items, 544 are A items (0.08 * 6,800), 2,244 are B items (0.33 * 6,800) and 4,012 are C items (0.59 * 6,800). If you want to count every day the same number of items, you have to divide the number of items A, B and C for the days between being counted twice. So, if you have to count each day a number of items A, the amount is 544/19 working days, that is 28.6315789. The same with B (2,244/60 = 37.4) and with C (4,012/118 = 34). Each day, you have to count 28.63 A plus 37.4 B plus 34 C. 28.63+37.4+34=100.03.

6 0
4 years ago
Kaspar and Ludger, two unrelated calendar year corporations, have the following transactions for 2019: Kaspar Corporation Ludger
Karolina [17]

Answer:

The dividends received deduction <u>for Kaspar Corporation is $70,000</u>, while the dividends received deduction f<u>or Ludger Corporation is $230,000</u>.

Explanation:

Note that the data in the question are merged together but they are first sorted in the attached excel file before answering the question as follows:

The dividends received deduction refers a federal tax deduction that are enjoyed in the U.S. by some corporations that receives dividends from related entities.

Based on the general rule for dividends received deduction, if the ownership by the company receiving the dividend in the company paying the dividend is less than 20%, the dividends received deduction is the 70% of the dividend received.

Since both Kaspar and Ludger have just 15% ownership which is less than 20% in domestic corporation from which they received dividends, their dividends received deduction can therefore be determined using the following formula:

Dividend received deduction = Dividend received * 70% .............. (1)

Using equation (1), we have:

Kaspar's dividend received deduction = $100,000 * 70% = $70,000

Ludger's dividend received deduction = $230,000 * 70% = $161,000

Therefore, the dividends received deduction for Kaspar Corporation is $70,000, while the dividends received deduction for Ludger Corporation is $230,000.

Download xlsx
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Comprehensive problem 5 part
    14·2 answers
  • 1
    10·2 answers
  • A U.S. corporation has purchased currency put options to hedge a 100,000 Canadian dollar (C$) receivable. The premium is $.02 pe
    9·1 answer
  • Define circulation ​
    15·2 answers
  • Waterway Industries applies overhead on the basis of machine hours. Given the following data, compute overhead applied and the u
    11·1 answer
  • Shawn Bixby borrowed $39,000 on a 150-day, 9% note. After 80 days, Shawn paid $4,200 on the note. On day 113, Shawn paid an addi
    7·1 answer
  • Oriole owes $3.4 million that is due on February 28. The company borrows $2670000 on February 25 (5-year note) and uses the proc
    9·1 answer
  • What is meant by trigonometric ratios?​
    15·2 answers
  • You are trying to explain to your friend the difference between managers and leaders. You would be most accurate in saying _____
    11·1 answer
  • The strategy that founder Seth Goldman used to get Honest Tea on the shelves alongside larger, established brands was:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!