Answer:
C-A newspaper prints a critical but truthful report about a congressperson
Explanation:
It says “ means that newspapers, newscasts, magazines and journals can report on negative information about an event or individual, as long as they are truthful. “ and if the newspaper has a negative report about a congressman, but it is all true, then it is allowed and protected by the 1st amendment.
Congress enacted the CRIRA in 1980, giving the US attorney general legal standing to bring suit in federal court on behalf of persons institutionalised by the states under unconstitutional conditions. Institutionalised persons almost lacked the resources and the ability to protect constitutioanl and federal statutory rights to adequate living conditions. CRIPA was needed because several federal court cases in the late 1970s denied the attorney general standing absent express statutory authority.
Actually why argue about the speed limit. It is there for everyone's protection. It is there for a good reason. So why argue about it? Yes some people don't follow it. But that is the job of a police officer not of some kids in 6th grade. My point is don't argue against it argue for it.
<span>The argument can be made with substantial evidence that he was correct. Consider the entire history of the Cold War. A shorter study would be the Soviet invasions of Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan. Had either nation had strong, organized militaries, the USSR would likely never have crossed the borders.</span>
Answer:
D. The American Revolution
