1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin2010 [14]
4 years ago
12

What was a negative of the 1933 National Industry Recovery Act?

History
2 answers:
Damm [24]4 years ago
3 0
The biggest negative for the average American following the implementation of NIRA was the infamous section 7(a) of the act, which guaranteed the right the workers' right to organize unions. Although labour unions in of themselves are not inherently bad, the sweeping protections guaranteed by the act lead to a wave of general strikes across the United States as unions felt the government was now on their side in their fight for better wages and working conditions. Because of this, the NIRA actually ironically hurt American industry for a short period of time.
Politically, the NIRA was also a big negative for Franklin D Roosevelt's Democrats as it caused a decline in support for Roosevelt's "New Deal" economic programs which had been a central part of his campaign platform in the 1932 US presidential election.
Sloan [31]4 years ago
3 0

A negative effect of the 1933 National Industry Revovery Act was: employees spying on employers.

The National Industry Recovery Act (NIRA) was passed during the Great Depression as a way to try to get American businesses back onto solid footing.  But it was an overreach.  It did give employees the right to collective bargaining with employers -- but that was a good thing.  The bad thing was how the  NIRA pushed and sometimes forced industries to operate in government-sanctioned alliances or cartels.  (This was similar to actions that had been taken in Mussolini's fascist Italy.)  Antitrust laws were suspended in this process.  In effect, this meant the government was encouraging industries to set fixed prices, wages, and production levels.  Much of this was enforced by the National Recovery Administration (NRA), created by an executive order from President Roosevelt following the passage of the NIRA.  The Blue Eagle symbol was used as the emblem of the NRA.  Businesses were to have a Blue Eagle sign in their windows saying, “We Do Our Part.” That was meant to show that each business adhered to the set price and production codes.  Citizen committees then engaged in spying on local businesses and report them to authorities if they violated pricing agreements by trying to sell at lower than the set prices.

A Supreme Court case in 1935, A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, ultimately decided that the provisions of the NIRA and the actions of the NRA were unconstitutional.

You might be interested in
Why did the writers of the american constitution divide authority among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches?
tatiyna
<span>To prevent abuse or misuse of power</span>
5 0
3 years ago
How did many southerners view the North in the mid-1800s? Southerners thought that the North's wage labor system was a bad syste
Naddik [55]
Hi the answer is, A. Southerners thought that the North's wage labor system was a bad system!!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Japan's territory change between 1910 and 1933?
Tems11 [23]
It was extremly bad...................
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how the Scientific revolution relates to the increasing secularization of the nineteenth century.
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

this is long sorry.

Explanation:

The Scientific Revolution was initially a movement that buttressed Christianity. Only in the late 19th century did science become a secularizing force.

It’s often claimed that empirical validation replaced religious authority. That’s a facile assumption but false.

In fact, Boyle and Newton were fervent Christians who believed that modern science provided endless and compelling evidence of God’s Design and existence. Indeed, this was the chief value of science. This attitude prevailed throughout the eighteenth century. Christianity gained a new modern justification in science.

The chief secularizers were not scientists, but Enlightenment philosophers. Their beliefs would become enshrined in the constitutions that would secularize society. The most important of them - Locke, Rousseau and Voltaire - were Christians. Their disgust with religious wars and religious tyranny, and their respect for the dignity of independent thought, drove them to challenge Christian authoritarianism. The Scientific Revolution played little role here.

A few secularists such as d’Holbach and La Mettrie were more clearly driven by scientific views, namely, atomism, but their views had marginal influence on secularism. Moreover, their atheistic materialism has a lineage separate from the Scientific Revolution. It encompasses Spinoza, the School of Padua (philosophers such as Zabarella and Pomponazzi), and the 14th century rediscovery of Lucretius, and it was born from philosophical considerations, not by scientific method. By contrast, whenever materialism intersected the Scientific Revolution, natural philosophers, such as Descartes, Gassendi, and Malebranche endeavored as dutiful Christians to re-infuse that materialism with God.

It wasn’t until the 19th century that science switched sides and became the ally of secularization. Two factors prevailed: Scientific materialism became a dominant viewpoint openly hostile to religion (signaled by Feuerbach in Germany and George Combe in England); and the theory of evolution finally retired science from confirming Design. The intricate workings of Nature no longer attested God’s hand, but were understood as having evolved over geologic time.

But this was a recent development. The modern stand-off between science and religion, and stories like Galileo’s struggle with the Church, lead us to imagine that science was always a secularizing force opposed to Christianity, but the opposite was true.

i hope this will help you with anything :)

7 0
3 years ago
The Pequot War led to a broader conflict between colonists and Indians that has
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

ITS A OR D

Explanation:

O-O

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which countries are the United States top trading partners?
    12·1 answer
  • Powers that belong exclusively to the states are called ______ powers. <br>Concurrent<br>Reserved
    5·1 answer
  • How did the ancient Greeks explain whether, seasons, and natural disasters?
    10·1 answer
  • What is Jane Addams known for
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a characteristic of Pure Land Buddhism?
    14·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph on how Hawaii's government was before the annexation and how Hawaiian people chose democracy.
    13·1 answer
  • How does this picture illustrate Japanese desperation towards the end of World War II?
    11·1 answer
  • TARGATED GROUPS DURING THE HOLOCOUST INCLUDED
    14·2 answers
  • 1. What is believed to be the cause of the factory fire?
    6·1 answer
  • Why would you put money into a savings account?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!