Answer:
I believe it is D
Explanation:
The first, "Send in the next defendant" is based on factual information, while the second, "Presidential Pardon NOT Just for the Birds" is trying to persuade the reader.
I think the answer is A or B
Answer and Explanation:
1. The words that make the joke vivid are adjectives like "shines", "tiny", "White" "luminous", "red", "redness." The phrases that make the anecdote vivid are the descriptive phrases that present what is happening in the story being told, among these phrases we can quote: "The spotlight shines on the magician's assistent", "The great Tonsoni annouces he will change her dress from white to red", "The woman is awash in flood of redness."
2. These words have an effect of creating mental images in the reader who can see what is being discarded through the words presented. This promotes a full understanding not only of the story, but of the space it presents and the configuration that is exposed.
Chemical changes I think but also I think both but mostly chemical I think.
Hope it helps
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, but anyway, here is the answer. The one that best <span> describes how the graph differs from Chekhov's story about the same topic is this: it provides a factual view of the topic.</span>
