It is characterized primarily by a paradox. A paradox is a statement or proposition that notwithstanding sound or apparently sound reasoning from acceptable premises that mains to a conclusion that appears pointless, logically intolerable or self-contradicting or seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or offer that when examined or clarified may prove to be well instituted or true.
Answer:
What were Lewis and Clark's objectives with the Indians? Every time that they met an Indian tribe, they had three things they wanted to do. They wanted to find out about them for Jefferson. They wanted to establish trade relations because that's gonna be part of an empire for the United States.
Explanation:
Advances were made in medicine and technology
According to Mill, the main criticism of utilitarianism is that it is incompatible with justice.
As per Mill, utilitarianism is consistent with the key tenets of how we typically conceive about justice.
The common understanding of justice is that certain interests should be given priority; we refer to them as being safeguarded by rights.
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasizing results. It embodies consequentialism in some way.
According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest good for the largest number of people is the most morally right one.
Mill backs up this assertion by demonstrating how all other things that people desire are either ways to achieve happiness or are part of the concept of happiness.
The sense of justice is essentially founded on utility, and rights only exist because they are required for human enjoyment, according to Mill, who goes into great detail about this.
To know more about justice, visit:
brainly.com/question/7104813
#SPJ4
