1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalka [10]
3 years ago
8

Which describes Justinian's Code?

History
2 answers:
snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
4 0

For those of you who are doin the test rn here are the answers to all of them. Hope this helps! ;) I did the quiz

aleksley [76]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a set of laws

Explanation:

The answer which describes Justinian's code is a set of laws. Code of Justinian, also known as Corpus Juris Civilis, is a collection of fundamental works in jurisprudence, issued from 529 to 534 by order of Justinian I, Eastern Roman Emperor.

You might be interested in
How did advances in agriculture effect the growth of cities
hram777 [196]

More food= more people, more people means you need more food, which means you get people to make more food, which attracts more people, etc, etc.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lực lượng đông đảo nhất trong phong trào chống pháp ở việt nam đầu thế kỉ 20 là
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

Nông dân là lực lượng tham gia đông đảo nhất trong phong trào dân tộc, dân chủ ở Việt Nam đầu thế kỉ XX. Sau chiến tranh thế giới thứ nhất, Pháp thực hiện cuộc khai thác thuộc địa lần thứ hai (1919 - 1929) đã làm cho xã hội Việt Nam có sự biến đổi.

8 0
2 years ago
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
Read the sentence.
geniusboy [140]
The answer is Also
My teacher always tell me
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did imperialism look the way it did in india?
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

the British did not look at india as a culture they looked at them as an opportunity to profit

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which person would most likely make this statement we need to be prepared we need to build up our air force and we need to built
    6·2 answers
  • What european country first began looking for a sea route to india?
    10·1 answer
  • What type of economic activity deals with extracting natural resources?
    10·2 answers
  • What does the term arabesque refer?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the causes of nativism?
    10·1 answer
  • ___ is the Norse name for the home of mankind.
    11·2 answers
  • What is the percentage change from 2.50 to 2.00? Please help i have a 28 in math
    11·1 answer
  • Step One: Deconstruction and Observation
    15·1 answer
  • Who likes my profile picture??
    11·1 answer
  • What long-term effect did the Civil War have on American industry?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!