1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pashok25 [27]
3 years ago
6

NEED HELP ASAP! BRAINLIEST WILL BE GIVEN ALONG WITH POINTS!

History
1 answer:
siniylev [52]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Mali Empire (Manding: Nyeni[5] or Niani; also historically referred to as the Manden Kurufaba,[1] sometimes shortened to Manden) was an empire in West Africa from c. 1235 to 1670. The empire was founded by Sundiata Keita and became renowned for the wealth of its rulers, especially Musa Keita. The Manding languages were spoken in the empire. The Mali Empire was the largest empire in West Africa and profoundly influenced the culture of West Africa through the spread of its language, laws and customs.[6] Much of the recorded information about the Mali Empire comes from 14th-century North African Arab historian Ibn Khaldun, 14th-century Moroccan traveller Ibn Battuta and 16th-century Moroccan traveller Leo Africanus. The other major source of information is Mandinka oral tradition, through storytellers known as griots.[7]

The empire began as a small Mandinka kingdom at the upper reaches of the Niger River, centred around the town of Niani (the empire's namesake in Manding). During the 11th and 12th centuries, it began to develop as an empire following the decline of the Ghana Empire to the north. During this period, trade routes shifted southward to the savanna, stimulating the growth of states. The early history of the Mali Empire (before the 13th century) is unclear, as there are conflicting and imprecise accounts by both Arab chroniclers and oral traditionalists. Sundiata Keita (c. 1214 – c. 1255) is the first ruler for which there is accurate written information (through Ibn Khaldun). Sundiata Keita was a warrior-prince of the Keita dynasty who was called upon to free the Mali people from the rule of the king of the Sosso Empire, Soumaoro Kanté. The conquest of Sosso in c. 1235 gave the Mali Empire access to the trans-Saharan trade routes.

Following the death of Sundiata Keita in c. 1255, the kings of Mali were referred to by the title mansa.[7] Sundiata's nephew Mansa Musa made a Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca during the reign of the Mamluk Sultan Baibars (r. 1260–1277). Following a series of usurpations of the throne of Mali, in c. 1285 Sakoura, a former royal court slave, became emperor and was one of its most powerful rulers, greatly expanding the territories of Mali. He made a pilgrimage to Mecca during the reign of Mamluk Sultan An-Nasir Muhammad (r. 1298–1308). After he died on his return, the throne reverted to the descendants of Sundiata Keita. After the reigns of three more emperors, Musa Keita became emperor in c. 1312. Musa made a famous pilgrimage to Mecca from 1324 to 1326. His generous gifts to Mamluk Egypt and his expenditure of gold caused gold to be greatly devalued, which gave rise to his fame outside of Mali. In 1337, he was succeeded by his son Maghan I, who in 1341 was deposed by his uncle Suleyman. It was during Suleyman's reign that Ibn Battuta visited Mali.[8] Following this period, a period of weak emperors, conflicts and disunity began in Mali.

Ibn Khaldun died in 1406, and following his death there was no continuous record of events in the Mali Empire. It is known from the Tarikh al-Sudan that Mali was still a sizeable state in the 15th century. The Venetian explorer Alvise Cadamosto and Portuguese traders confirmed that the peoples of the Gambia were still subject to the mansa of Mali.[9] Upon Leo Africanus's visit at the beginning of the 16th century, his descriptions of the territorial domains of Mali showed that it was still a kingdom of considerable area. However, from 1507 onwards neighbouring states such as Diara, Great Fulo and the Songhay Empire eroded the extreme territories of Mali. In 1542, the Songhay invaded the capital city of Niani but were unsuccessful in conquering the empire. During the 17th century, the Mali empire faced incursions from the Bamana Empire. After unsuccessful attempts by Mansa Mama Maghan to conquer Bamana, in 1670 Bamana sacked and burned Niani, and the Mali Empire rapidly disintegrated and ceased to exist, being replaced by independent chiefdoms. The Keitas retreated to the town of Kangaba, where they became provincial chiefs.[10]

You might be interested in
Why is it important to use proper vocabulary when referring to historical events
Vesnalui [34]
Because if you put a hard word on a year 2 assignment they would not understand it.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
CAN SOME DO THIS ASSIGNMENT ITS ABOUT ABOUT "Was the United States Justified in Going to War With Mexico?" WRITE THEM IN PARAGRA
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

Brainliest please

Explanation:

The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had exfoliate American blood on American soil, Texas (a land that numerous Mexicans still considered theirs) was an independent democracy and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to come part of the United States, which means that the United States.

During 1846-1848, Mexico and the United States were mooting over whether Texas and California was Mexico's home or America's home.. The United States was unjustified in going into war with Mexico because President JamesK. Polk provoked it, the thievery of land, and the slavery expansion.

7 0
2 years ago
In what way did the Vietnam War shape the U.S. presidency in 1968
viktelen [127]
The people wanted peace (out of the war in Vietnam fueled by the policy of containment) so the ones who were running for president needed to address this. 
4 0
3 years ago
A key part of the war on crime that began in the 1960s was increased punishments for drug offenses. A key argument by many detra
krok68 [10]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

People who oppose the War on Drugs argue that drug offenders should not be incarcerated because most of them are not violent criminals, and being a drug addict should not be considered a crime but a disease, and correspondingly, should be treated by medical professionals.

Unfair incarceration of drug offenders contributes to the break up of families, specially in low-income areas, and this phenomenon as a whole affects society. Children born in households with incarcerated parents are more likely to be poor, to become addicts themselves, or to commit crimes in the future.

6 0
3 years ago
In 1965, as the conflict in Vietnam intensified, the United States
8_murik_8 [283]

escalated its troop commitment to the conflict.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which trees are seen in Maracaibo
    14·1 answer
  • What is a benefit of having a difficult amendment process?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Why was the creation of the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut an important milestone in the growth of representative governme
    5·1 answer
  • For number 45, please pick 1,2,3 or 4 as the answer. Thank you!
    9·1 answer
  • Why did democracy end in greece?
    12·1 answer
  • PLS HELP I HAVE A TIMED TESTOf the government officials listed below, which is the only office NOT elected by American voters?
    10·2 answers
  • Which living conditions problem was more serious, the lack of sanitary codes, or lack of building codes, and why?
    13·1 answer
  • Ancient Chinese saying: “when things have reached their peak, they ____.”
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Define the Enlightenment. Who were the main philosophers and what were their beliefs? How did they influence the Declaration
    7·1 answer
  • What is the 7th amendment.<br> I need answers!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!