Answer:
Hanna is correct.
Explanation:
The sale of the 2004 Dodge cannot be construed to be a sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code since this law covers sales of goods by merchants. Hanna cannot be said to be a merchant of 2004 Dodge as she is not known to be in the business for the purchase and sale of cars. Therefore, the case should be adjudicated under the common law. What has taken place in this instance is the exchange of a personal asset. Hanna cannot make a trading profit from the sale, but a capital gain. Rachel is not correct.
Answer:
C. Mass Marketing
Explanation:Mass Marketing is a type of marketing where the target is to get the connect with a large number of customers or consumers as possible. Mass Marketing is done through mass media and other marketing channels to ensure that the greatest number of persons are reached to guarantee that the company sale a larger Volume of products or services, this type of marketing has been adopted by many multinational companies.
Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
Answer:
c. $84,500 provided
Explanation:
Net decrease in cash = $14,500
Net cash used in investing activities = $56,500
Net cash used in financing activities = $42,500
Amount of cash was provided (used) in operating activities
= - $14,500 + $56,500 + $42,500
= $84,500
This is positive,hence provided. Th right answer is c. $84,500 provided