Judicial review<span> is the doctrine under which legislative and executive </span>actions<span> are subject to </span>review<span> by the </span>judiciary<span>. A court with </span>judicial review<span> power may invalidate laws and decisions that are incompatible with a higher authority, such as the terms of a written constitution.</span>
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:
it is not clear ooo ooo. may be u should enlarged it
Feeling deep compass and admiration for someone.
I hope this helps.
The primary function of the family is to ensure the continuation of society, both biologically through procreation, and socially through socialization. Given these functions, the nature of one's role in the family changes over time.
