Answer:
Part a. The graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b. The values in table model a proportional relation.
3.5 minutes per mile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a.
The graph shown in the question representing Janet's data is not a straight line although it passes through the origin.
That is why the rate of change of distance with time is not constant.
Therefore, the graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b.
If we plot the data in the table using distance in miles along the y-axis and time in minutes along the x-axis, then we will get a straight line passing through the origin.
So, the values in the table model a proportional relation.
Now, Tarik's unit rate in minutes per miles will be
minutes per mile. (Answer)
Answer:
J
-66
Step-by-step explanation:
a1 = 2
n = 18
d = - 4
a18 = a1 + (n - 1) * d
a18 = 2 + (18 - 1)*(-4)
a18 = 2 + 17*-4
a18 = 2 - 68
a18 = -66
Answer:
y=x+11
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
About 11.10 Percent off. The change from 315 to 350 was an increase
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y^2 + 16y + 64 = 0
(y + 8)(y+8) = 0
y + 8 = 0
y = -8
y + 8 = 0
y = -8
Step-by-step explanation: