I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Dispute resolution at initial level injects a sense of security and belief in an individual and hence improves the relationship between the two
Explanation:
The internal conflicts between the people and institution if resolved at an earlier stage build confidence in people working in the institution. They also start respecting the institution and start believing that their voices are also heard irrespective of their post.
This also brings clarity in relation and expectations both at the institution and individual level. Once a strong bond develops through this exercise of dispute resolution at initial level, the relation between institution and people become co-ordial.
-Muhammad Ali modernized Egypt by creating economic reforms, tax collection, landholding, irrigation, cotton production, local industries, and world trade.
-It was a bad thing for Egypt because they’d have to pay it back, Egypt’s economy soon began to decline. The factories stopped producing. Egypt got into serious debt with British banks.
-Bad leadership is one
of them. Ali’s family took over after his death. A second explanation for Egypt’s failure was environmental. They didn’t have as much coal as the Europeans. Egyptian factories moved their machines using animals.
A third explanation is European competition. European countries tried to ruin the Egyptian industry on purpose.
-Some looked for solutions in modernizing, or becoming more like Europeans, while others wanted to return to their Islamic roots. Some Egyptians believed Western-inspired reforms could still function within an Islamic framework, as a kind of middle ground. One scholar, Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, argued that Islam could be modernized and mixed with democracy.
-The most convincing is the environment. European countries were able to produce more coal, which would cause Egypt’s trades to reduce.
I’m not sure what the last answer is, sorry
The correct answer would be B.
Hope this helps!
