1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Debora [2.8K]
3 years ago
14

The soldiers walked through the rain as they approached the canyon. They’d been traveling for days to reach the dragon’s lair. F

inally they arrived. Then the dragon approached, and it roared. Yet, the soldiers faced off with the dragon, despite the noise.
Which is the best critique explaining why Henrique should revise the paraphrase?
English
1 answer:
77julia77 [94]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

option B. The best critique to explain why  Henrique should revise the paragraph is that he needs to add some descriptive language to make the story come alive. In literature a commonly used device is the one of descriptive language. Basically, descriptive language is used to create a picture of the scene/character in the reader's mind. Henrique's story is laying the order of events in a logical order but it is lacking the descriptive language that will give details to those events, making the reader to engage with the story line.

Hope this helps!

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are Logical Fallacies<br><br><br> in your own words. don't lookup google definition
quester [9]

Answer:

A logical fallacy is a mistaken belief to the effect that inferences having a certain structure are valid. Put another way,  a logical fallacy is a belief in the legitimacy of what is in fact an illegitimate rule of inference.  As the examples below indicate, logical fallacies are sometimes a reflection of mere prejudice and in other cases they embody actual ratiocinative  shortcomings.

Explanation:

Here are some examples:

(1) People will often accept what people in authority, even if the data clearly indicates that they're wrong. If an economist from Harvard weighs in on an issue and homeless person weighs in on that same issue, the economist will be believed and the homeless person will be ridiculed, even if the data makes it very clear that the homeless person is right. (This is known as the 'fallacy of authority.' )

(2) People tend judge others by their words, not their deeds, with the result that a grouchy person who does good is seen as evil, whereas an evil person who pays lip-service to virtue is seen as good.

(3) People assume that what they are not familiar with is impossible. Smith says that his girlfriend has symptoms XYZ and Jones, not having ever personally seen anybody exhibiting those symptoms, refuses on that basis alone to believe Jones.

(4) People have some tendency to assume that entailments are 'convertible', i.e. that if q follows from p, then p also follows from q ('if Smith was decapitated, then he died; so given that he died, he must have been decapitated'). This known as 'affirming the consequent.'        

(5) It is assumed that confirmation is transitive, i.e. that if p confirms q and q confirms r, then p confirms. But this is not so. Smith's being a crime boss is evidence of his having considerable, and Smith's having considerable wealth is evidence of his having some kind of legitimate employment; but Smith's being a crime boss is not evidence of his having legitimate employment.

When people commit fallacies 1-3, their doing so tends to have an emotional basis; they want to believe that authority-figures are good people, that people are honest, and that what is strange is impossible. When people commit fallacies 4 and 5, their doing is less a reflection of emotionally rooted prejudices than of sheer lack of acumen. In any case, all of these fallacies are routinely committed.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
15 Points
notka56 [123]
4)Paragraph from question 1 and 3
What is the purpose of this paragraph is D)To create interest in the topic of novels that all i now that is easy
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ENGLISH 20+ points mark as brainliest
Andreyy89

Answer:

A: To act as the subject of the main clause

6 0
3 years ago
We use pronouns so that _____
zubka84 [21]
So we dont have to keep saying the persons name over and over again

Example without pronouns : Alex had a great time, alex also likes going outside, then alex did his homework.

Example with pronouns : Alex ahd a great time, he also likes going outside, then he did his homeowrk.
7 0
3 years ago
Which is the best summary of this paragraph?
Ghella [55]
I would say that the best summary of this paragraph is C) Systems transmitting information across a distance are called telegraphs. The word telegraph originates from Greek words. The world has moved forward since ancient forms of communication, and people now exchange email addresses because of the Internet.
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Employers expect graphic designer to be ____ along with having great planning and organizational skills
    15·2 answers
  • To reflect about a problem means to ask yourself about any possible what ifs. true or false
    13·2 answers
  • DIRECT ANSWER ONLY!!! I need it right now!!
    12·1 answer
  • Ou have been assigned to compose a narrative essay about a time when you had an argument with a friend.
    7·2 answers
  • What does Montag imagine would happen if he stayed at Faber's house?
    14·1 answer
  • You visit the Web site of a nature museum. You want to find out what admission to the museum costs. What would lead you to the a
    6·1 answer
  • Read the story.
    8·1 answer
  • I need help with 1 - 10 please help!
    6·1 answer
  • (RL. 2.4) Reread the first sentence in paragraph 2 of Holinshed’s Chronicles: What is Banquo’s tone in this section?
    5·1 answer
  • Short reading "Do We Respond Better Under Pressure?"
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!