1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Cerrena [4.2K]
4 years ago
6

Explain the political geographic and cultural impact of the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo

History
2 answers:
Vanyuwa [196]4 years ago
5 0

<em><u>The political geographic and cultural impact of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was that it doubled the territories of America and halved the size of Mexico. </u></em>

<em><u></u></em>

Further Explanations:

Treaty of Guadalupe was the end treaty of the Mexican - American War signed on 2nd February 1848.The conflict ranged from 1846-1848 between both the nations in which Mexico faced the defeat.

According to the treaty signed between them, America was compelled to pay a compensation of 15 million dollars to Mexico for his reconstruction and  America got control of California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, half of  New Mexico and some territories of Colorado and Wyoming. The locales of these areas were given choice to relocate to a new area or get American citizenship to live in the captured areas. This increased the radical diversity of America and the Mexican Americans were considered as foreigners universally.

Overall we can say that Mexico was in a bad position as per its negotiation power and was in a very delicate position. The Treaty just created a political inequality between the two countries and even lopsided their relation forever.

Learn more

  1. in a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. is elected by representatives chosen by the people. is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament. is elected directly by the people?<u>brainly.com/question/477236 </u>
  2. starting in the1800s, members of the suffragist movement in the united states focused on women's right to/<u>brainly.com/question/1298741 </u>
  3. which of the following best describes the ottoman empire in the years just before world war I? <u>brainly.com/question/1487507 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Chapter: Treaty of Guadalupe

Keywords: Treaty of Guadalupe, Mexican – American, California,Arizona,Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming, radical diversity

il63 [147K]4 years ago
4 0

After Mexico's defeat on the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo came into action. The U.S. was recquired to pay 15 million dollars as compensation for damages, while taking ownership of the territories of California, half of New Mexico, most of Arizona, Nevada, Utah and parts of Wyoming and Colorado.

Mexicans that were settled in these territories, had the choice to relocate within the new limits of their country, or stay and receive American citizenship with full civil rights. This had quite big implications in U.S. culture as it became more racially diverse. In the following censuses between 1850 and 1920 most annexed mexicans were counted as "white", but in reality, segregation only grew with time and continues to do so until this day, with mexican-native americans being considered foreigners almost universally. At the same time, mexican migration to these areas also continued to rise over the years, making the contrast bigger.

Politically, we can say Mexico wasn't in a bad position in terms of their negotiation power. The U.S. had shown itself hesitant to annex Mexico's territories and having deep domestic divisions in regards to the aims and justification for the expansion. However, the military power of the U.S. overshadowed all of that and their victory was definite. The treaty established a pattern of political inequality between the two countries, and this lopsided relationship has stalked Mexican-U.S. relations ever since.


Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
How did the rulers/leaders of Mali gain stature among Arabic states?
vlabodo [156]

Answer: Mali’s rulers adopted the title of ‘Mansa.  Mali’s founder, Sundiata, firmly established himself as a strong leader in both the religious and secular sense, claiming that he had a direct link to spirits of the land, thus making him the guardian of the ancestors. His empire extended from the fringes of the forest in the southwest through the grassland country of the Malinké to the Sahel and Southern Sahara ports of the Walatta and Tandmekka, and Arabic scholars estimate that Sundiata ruled for about 25 years and died in 1255.

Despite the great extent of the Empire of Mali it was often plagued by insufficient leadership. Yet Sundiata’s son Mansa Wali, who became the next King, is considered to have been one of the most powerful rulers of Mali.  Mansa Wali would, in turn, be succeeded by his brother Wati, who was succeeded by his brother called Kahlifa. Kahlifa was seen as a particularly bad ruler, and some chroniclers describe how he would use bows and arrows to kill people for entertainment. Because of his misrule, Kahlifa was deposed and replaced by a grandchild of Sundiata named Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr had been adopted by Sundiata as a son, although he was a grandchild and the son of Sundiata's daughter, which would have greatly strengthened his claim to the throne.

The leadership trouble in the Malian Empire would continue after the ascension of Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr was deposed in a coup by a man named Sakura, who was either a slave or a military commander. The low stature of Sakura perhaps implies that the royal family had lost much of its popularity amongst the common people. Sakura’s reign, however, would also be a troubled one; after he had converted to Islam, Sakura undertook a pilgrimage to Mecca but was killed by the Danakil people during his return journey while in the city of Tadjoura. It is disputed why Sakura was in Tadjoura, as it was not a natural route to take when returning from Mecca to Mali, and also for what reasons he was killed. Some suggest that he was killed because the Danakil wanted to steal his gold.

Sakura’s rise to power also shows us that the ruling family, and the Mansa, had limited power in the Empire of Mali and that the officers of the court wielded significant power in comparison. The Empire of Mali was organised into provinces with a strict hierarchical structure [xxxviii] in which each province had a Governor, and each town had a mayor or mochrif. Large armies were deployed to stop any rebellions in the smaller kingdoms and to safeguard the many trade routes. The decentralisation of power to lower levels of government bureaucracy through court officers, together with a strict hierarchical structure, was part of why the Malian Empire was so stable despite a series of bad rulers. Despite squabbles within the ruling family, the devolution of state administrative power through lower structures meant that the Empire could function quite well. In times of good rulers, the Empire would expand its territory, rendering it one of the largest Empires in West African history.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How is Islam different from Christianity?​
Tanya [424]

Answer:

Christians believe that Jesus was the incarnated Son of God, divine, and sinless. Islam teaches that Jesus was one of the most important prophets of God, but not the Son of God, not divine, and not part of the Trinity. Rather, Muslims believe the creation of Jesus was similar to the creation of Adam

7 0
3 years ago
According to the supreme court, what is the status of prayer in the public schools?
cupoosta [38]
Our Father who art in Heaven,
Holy be thy name,
Thy Kingdom come
Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven
Give us this day, our daily bread,
And forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those,
Who sin against us,
Do not bring us to the test
But deliever us from evil,
Amen.
I am not sure about this
6 0
3 years ago
For hundreds of years Europeans thought Native Americans did not have a literary tradition because
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I believe the answer is A because Europeans often overlooked the native americans, which is also why they overlooked their literary traditions because their language was overlooked.

hope this helps!!! :3

4 0
1 year ago
What led to the form of political parties
statuscvo [17]

Multiple people had different views on what they wanted so in order to satisfy everyone there was a compromise of multiple parties for the extensive views

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In order to run each department within the Executive Branch, Washington
    11·1 answer
  • The standard theatre space throughout europe beginning in the late seventeenth century, which grew in popularity in the united s
    6·1 answer
  • How did a lord most benefit from granting a fief to his vassal?
    9·1 answer
  • In 1803, the United States purchased an area on this map from France. This purchase motivated the United States to organize
    6·1 answer
  • In Book 9, what is Achilles doing when the Phoenix, Ajax, and Odysseus arrive at his tent? How does it relate to the main cause
    13·1 answer
  • What did King George Ill and Parliament do to try and keep peace
    12·1 answer
  • Spooky story i get you 24 point
    10·2 answers
  • TRUE OR FALSE? The Pope as the head of the Roman Catholic Church assumes power as an elective monarch by being selected by Churc
    8·1 answer
  • The Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918
    14·2 answers
  • HELP! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST<br> ____________ ______________ founded the Georgia colony.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!