Answer:
The answer is an experimental group.
Explanation:
An experimental group, also called a treatment group, consists of a group that usually receives some kind of treatment during an experiment. The group is usually composed of test subjects like people, animals, plants, among others. The treatment refers to the variable that is being studied.
When the group does not get the appropriate treatment is called the control group. There is one difference between the control group and the experimental group and it could be the hypothesis you are working with.
Answer: The correct answer is : Profitability
Explanation: As a company, the media mainly seeks to gather mass audiences to sell to advertisers. The equal-time Rule required that the media would sell advertising time to all candidates if they sold it to anyone. There is a tendency to select media sources that have similar views to their own, which is called selective exposure.
If Rick is not satisfied with the judgment rendered by the court he can appeal the findings in one of 12 circuit courts of appeal.
The united states district courts are the trial courts of the U.S. federal judiciary. There is one district court docket for every federal judicial district, which each covers one U.S. state or, in a few cases, a part of a state. every district court has as a minimum one courthouse, and lots of districts have multiple.
Circuit courts are court systems in several common law jurisdictions. The core idea of circuit courts requires judges to travel to different locales to make sure extensive visibility and know-how of cases in a vicinity.
A court is any man or woman or institution, often as a government organization, with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between parties and carry out the management of justice in civil, crook, and administrative matters in accordance with the rule of law.
Learn more about district court here brainly.com/question/1302046
#SPJ4
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
Snapshot
Explanation:
Snapshot forensics is a branch of forensics that focuses on accurately representing and analyzing a particular point-in-time within a process. This is a consequence of the difficulties that other approaches present. If a process is continually changing, and researchers want to take all of this change into account, they are likely to face a problem in acquisition of data, as no point in the process can be considered the appropriate one to collect without dismissing the rest of it.
