Studies have suggested that texting or using a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as?

1 answer:

5 0

Studies have suggested that texting or using a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as:- "driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs."

Drivers talking by cell phone drove significantly worse than drivers talking to passengers. The cell phone users have been much more likely to drift off their lane, kept a greater distance between their vehicle and the car in front, and were 4 times more likely to miss pulling off the highway at the rest area.

The usage of your cellular phone even as riding is not only risky but also illegal. In California, you cannot use a mobile cellphone or similar digital communication tool while holding it in your hand. You can only use it in a hands-loose manner, such as speakerphone or voice commands, but never while holding it.

learn more about cell phones here brainly.com/question/1476828

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

what should be done to reduce the effects of the two major environmental problems in Latin America: air pollution in Mexico City

jolli1 [7]

Answer:

•Mexico City government has continued to strengthen vehicular emissions control with advanced technologies and surveillance programs, including Green inspectors and remote sensors to identify high emitting as well as non-compliance vehicles; improve fuel quality for both diesel and gasoline; improve public ..

•Industrial activities, the use of toxic pesticides, dams, and use of the land for agricultural non sustainable use, logging, tourism and other development activities have produced environmental pollution in Indigenous Peoples' lands, territories and their resources

•Following are some of the most common solutions to the environmental issue:

Replace disposal items with reusable items.
The use of paper should be avoided.
Conserve water and electricity.
Support environmental friendly practices.
Recycle the waste to conserve natural resources.

4 0

2 years ago

Which word applies to belief that an individual vote counts for something?

Archy [21]

Democary. hope i helped

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Steve brings his watch to Knell Watches to be repaired. Knell Watches sells and repairs watches. Steve entrusts his watch at Kne

BartSMP [9]

Answer:

Steve has no legal recourse against Jonathan but he can try to take action against Knell Watches.

Explanation:

The entrustment rule says that entrusting goods to a seller who deals in goods of that kind, gives that seller the power to transfer those goods and all rights to a buyer in the ordinary course of business. Entrusting includes giving your goods to the seller and leaving goods that have already been bought with the seller, with the intention of picking the goods up or having them delivered at a later stage.

Here Steve cannot claim back his watch from Jonathan because he gave the watch to Knell Watches willingly. Jonathan also bought the watch from Kevin in good faith, he had no idea that the watch had been stolen from Knell. Kevin sold the watch to him in good faith and he had no reason to doubt that the watch really belonged to Kevin because they are friends. if, however, someone else had taken the watch in to Knell Watches on behalf of Steve, then he would be able to get the watch back from Jonathan but he can't now because he took the watch in himself. Knell was also deceived by Kevin and so Jonathan is protected because of that according to Uniform Commercial Code.

6 0

3 years ago

4 ft

user100 [1]

Answer:

127

Explanation:

The parallelogram has a side length of 11 ft, and the width of 15 ft.

The rug in the middle has a side lenth of 4 ft and the width of 9.5 ft.

Multiply 11 and 15 together, and multiply 4 and 9.5 together. Then subtract the answer you get from 9.5 × 4 from 11 × 15. The answer should be 127!

3 0

3 years ago

32. a pedestrian crossing sign is an example of a regulatory sign.

viva [34]

The answer to your question is true

7 0

2 years ago