All categories

3 years ago

Both normal and special cause variation add to project cost and need to be considered by project managers

Business

1 answer:

Paha777 [63]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Variations in both common and special circumstances contribute to project costs and need to be weighed by project managers when they want to work more often.

Variability, is the degree to which data deviate differ from the estimated value in a probability distribution or data set, and the extent to which those data points differ from one another.
This is most commonly attributed in financial terms to the volatility of the returns on investment.

therefore the answer is true for the following.

You might be interested in

Koczela Inc. has provided the following data for the month of May: Inventories: Beginning Ending Work in process $ 20,000 $ 15,0

maria [59]

Answer:

$219,000

Explanation:

For computation of cost of goods manufactured for May first we need to find out the total manufacturing cost is shown below:-

Total manufacturing cost = Direct material + Direct labor + Manufacturing overhead cost applied to Work in Process

= $60,000 + $90,000 + $64,000

= $214,000

cost of goods manufactured for May = Total manufacturing cost + Beginning work in progress - Ending work in progress

= $214,000 + $20,000 - $15,000

= $234,000 - $15,000

= $219,000

8 0

3 years ago

On average, the firm receives 138 payments each day with an average value of $42 each. These payments clear the bank in an avera

lesantik [10]

I don’t no this sorry

8 0

3 years ago

The primary goal of the federal reserve system is to/12562961/289d096f?utm_source=registration

Finger [1]

The Federal Reserve System often referred to as the Federal Reserve or simply the Fed is the central bank of the United States. It was created by the Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system.

3 0

3 years ago

On January 2, 2005 Garr Company acquired machinery at a cost of $320,000. This machinery was being depreciated by the double-dec

Nostrana [21]

Answer:

The depreciation charge will be lower in 2007 using straight line method compared to the one produced by double-declining-balance method

Explanation:

Double-declining-balance method

Depreciation Expense = 2 × SLDP × BVSLDP

Therefore,

SLDP = 100 ÷ number of useful life

= 100 ÷ 8

= 12.5 %

Calculation of Depreciation Expenses (DE)

2005

DE = 2 × 12.5 % × $320,000

= $80,000

2006

DE = 2 × 12.5 % × ($320,000 - $80,000)

= $60,000

2007

DE = 2 × 12.5% × ($320,000 - $80,000 - $60,000)

= $45,000

Using Straight line Method for 2007 Depreciation Expense

Accumulated Depreciation (2005 to 2006) = $80,000 + $60,000

= $ 140,000

Depreciable Amount = Cost - Accumulated Depreciation

= $320,000 - $140,000

= $180,000

DE = (Cost - Residual Value) ÷ Remaining Useful Life

= $180,000 ÷ 6

= $30,000

Conclusion :

Comparing 2007 Depreciation Expense using double-declining-balance method against straight-line method of depreciation we can see that straight-line method of depreciation produces lower results.

5 0

3 years ago

Reading from left to right, which list shows the tax types that proportionally increase with a rise in income?

Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

Regressive, proportional, progressive

Explanation:

There are three main tax categories: regressive, proportional, and progressive.

Regressive Tax

Regressive taxes are type f tax accessed as a percentage of the value of an asset purchased or possessed. Under this system, low-income earners tend to pay a higher amount compared to high income earners because it has no correlation with what the taxpayer earns or their income level.

Proportional Tax

In a proportional tax system, everyone irrespective of their income pay the same rate. This tax system affects everyone equally.

Progressive Tax

A progressive tax has it name implies is progressive in nature.The tax rate increases as the income level of the tax payer increases. Therefore high-income earning individuals pay more than low-income earning individuals

3 0

3 years ago