Using the information regarding the proportion of work time linguists study a new language, choose the correct conclusion for th
1 answer:
Answer:
B) There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
the null hypothesis is;
the alternative hypothesis is:
The p - value for the hypothesis is 0.09
The level of significance ∝ = 0.025
The Decision rule is that to reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than the level of significance ∝.
Conclusion: We fail to reject the null hypothesis because the p-value is greater than the level of significance , therefore:
There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.
You might be interested in
Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Ms. Johnson space has 48 carpet squares.
Mr. Wei space has 36 carpet squares.
Factorize these two numbers:
All common factors are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12
<u>All possibilities:</u>
1. If Ms. Johnson space width and Mr. Wei space width is 1 carpet, then Ms. Johnson space length is 48 carpets and Mr. Wei space length is 36 carpets.
2. If Ms. Johnson space width and Mr. Wei space width is 2 carpets, then Ms. Johnson space length is 24 carpets and Mr. Wei space length is 18 carpets.
3. If Ms. Johnson space width and Mr. Wei space width is 3 carpets, then Ms. Johnson space length is 16 carpets and Mr. Wei space length is 12 carpets.
4. If Ms. Johnson space width and Mr. Wei space width is 4 carpets, then Ms. Johnson space length is 12 carpets and Mr. Wei space length is 9 carpets.
5. If Ms. Johnson space width and Mr. Wei space width is 6 carpets, then Ms. Johnson space length is 8 carpets and Mr. Wei space length is 6 carpets.
6. If Ms. Johnson space width and Mr. Wei space width is 12 carpets, then Ms. Johnson space length is 4 carpets and Mr. Wei space length is 3 carpets.