Answer:
No, I don't perceive Mr. S to be a reliable source. It is because the way he describes that how he discovered the Hae's body is enough to raise thr brows of viewers and listeners.
Explanation:
In Episode 3 of <em>Serial</em>, Mr. S is called by detectives to investigate his side of the story and how he came to find Hae's body which was found completely camouflaged in the dirt.
Mr. S can not be considered a reliabel source by the way he describes the event of his founding Hae's body in the forest, 127 miles away from the main road. Mr. S gives description to the detectives that he got off his car to pee and had a bottle of beer in his hand. It is interesting to note and enough to raise brows of listeners and viewers of the episode that how was he able to see Hae's body which was covered with dirt and was behind a heavy fallen log, which made impossible for someone to see the body easily (especially if someone is drunk).
So, because of this reasoning, one can not considered Mr. S to be a reliabel source.
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
Answer:
Explanation:
Any defacement or window smashing or anything which does harm to a person and harm to property is not protected by the 1st Amendment.
The only answer that is acceptable is C. No one or nothing is being harmed. The rights granted by the first amendment are enforced.
God help America if that ever changes.
...................I’m sorry it maybe safe guard but I’m not sure
Answer:
The right answer is option C rule in favour of the defendant unless plaintiff makes strong case
Explanation:
hope it help
Good day ✌️
