Because it was passed as a bill when our country first started.
A. I think I’m not sure though
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The correct answer was no need to pay taxes.
Answer:
As a licensed electrician of 10 years Hal should be aware of the risks associated with his job. Now, I'll tell you of all of the mistakes and unnecessary risks that made by Hal. First, seeing a there was no mention of a plumber, I'm going to assume that the utility room is still flooded. If it is not still flooded then ignore this and move on to my next point, but if it is then I would just like to say that as a man with 10 years of experience, he should be aware of the fact that water conducts electricity. Second, even if the electrocution didn't involve the water, as a professional he should be competent enough to wear proper safety equipment. And finally, if I was GBC I would hire another electrician to point out every mistake made and how the entire thing could have been avoided if Hal hadn't decided to cut corners.
I hope that helps! :)
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
This works for the charities almost all the time because interventions like these appeal to the human side as people are more likely to support causes like these.
Also, if children are sent door-to-door, this will compel people to give as they are less likely to suspect children since they are always potrayed as innocent.
Since these school-age children are usually involved in fund raising programs in their schools, donors are less likely to suspect fraud as fund raising is already popular among them.
Therefore, this makes is easy for phony charities to hide behind an already existing and legit system.
