Answer:
this is remotely true. you should be a teacher. and the answer is the jurassic era
Explanation:
because i was there and i saw it
Answer:c Synthesizing claims into a single conclusion
Explanation:
Answer:
Jim lifted the heavy bag of concrete because he was as strong as an ox.
Explanation:
It is the fourth one because it is the only sentence describing someone/thing as strong. (as an ox.)
The first one has nothing to do with being strong.
The second one would be correct if it was "The boat was as strong as an ox as it persevered through the rough waters.", but since that isn't the sentence, it wouldn't work.
The third one is incorrect because if the toy was made to be as strong as an ox, why is it breaking into tiny pieces?
Therefore, the fourth one is right. :)
Answer:
the composition of the lines.
Explanation:
The sentence has a vague pronoun problem because it is unclear if the police officer or the criminal tripped and fell. In order to correct this, the sentence needs to be more specific. We can say any of the following sentences:
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the officer </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear that the officer fell.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the criminal </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear the criminal fell.
This sentence wouldn't necessarily work with the original sentence since we can infer that only one of them fell because the writer used he. However, if both of them fell, it would be correct as well.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>they</u> tripped and fell.
