If you plug in the coordinates on a map, you get Worden, MT.
Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
The best example of people modifying their environment is the construction of cities, where homes and offices for working are built as well as plantation to provide food to community.
A parent argues that violation of a free appropriate public education often starts with the evaluative process because, with free education, students might begin to take schools and colleges for granted.
<h3>Disadvantages of Free Public Education</h3>
- Schools wouldn't exert as much effort to conserve funds and adhere to a budget if college was free. These schools would engage in wasteful expenditure practices as they are aware that they will always receive financing.
- Additionally, since education is free for everybody, private colleges would no longer need to compete for students.
- Students might not take school as seriously if it is free. Because their education is being given to them for free, they won't value it.
- When tuition is paid out of their own pockets, students are more likely to put more effort into their studies.
- In the US, the state is frequently responsible for paying for public education. The money would have to come from other crucial programs that many low-income families rely on if a state's budget didn't have enough money to finance free college.
To learn more about free public education refer to:
brainly.com/question/23566306
#SPJ4
