The answer for the given question above would be option D. Steinback's primary purpose for writing The Grapes of Wrath is to show how one family's struggle was representative of many others. He wrote this in order to show the poor working and living condition of California's migrant workers in the 1930s.
D should be correct. Hope I helped, tell me if I am incorrect :3
Answer:
I believe it's the last one.
Explanation:
One needs to look now farther than the first paragraph to realize that Vonnegut's tale is laced with irony and satire. The strongest hint is when he mentions that there are over 100 ammendments in the Constitution. All these ammendments are designed to make society "perfect." Later on George and his wife Hazel are discussing how George's handicaps, the bags of birdshot tied to his legs, are terribly inconvenient and painful. Hazel suggests George break a law and remove the bags since he isn't competing against anyone at home. George replies that if he broke the law so would others and they'd end up right back in the "Dark Ages". These examples depict there is no such thing as a perfect society. Equality does not bring about perfection and competition is essential for a thriving economy. In every society there are winners and losers.
Sorry if i'm wrong.
