I will tell you about what he feels the city have done to the black people in the community and why he did what he did.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any further references or attachments, we can say that the sectional conflict was a combination of an irrepressible conflict with the work of bungling politicians, fanatics, and agitators.
Before the Civil War, there were many incidents, events, and decisions that create more separation in the views of the northerners and southerners. In the North, the idea of abolitionism was supported by most states, while in the South, slavery was an important part of the economy. Indeed, southern states depended on slaves to produce the crops in large plantations. These crops had to be exported to Europe.
The Missouri Compromise or the Kansas-Nebraska Act was the product of different points of view from legislators trying to fix things until the problems too many that made seven states seceded from the Union, and later, the beginning of the Civil War.
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
"Internal Immigration" alludes to development starting with one area then onto the next. Albeit worldwide movement gets more consideration, the more noteworthy segment of versatility happened inside or between districts as individuals moved their work, material riches, and social thoughts.
On a very basic level, moves in relocation designs start in changes in landholding, business, statistic designs, and the area of capital. Long-standing examples of portability changed around 1750, when a stamped populace increment and expansion of country industry settled rustic individuals in assembling towns and towns, while those in different areas took to the street.
The industrialization of the nineteenth century delivered a urban culture and high movement rates that along these lines subsided in the twentieth century.
