1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
3 years ago
11

What would happen to industrialized nations’ economies if they did not expand their reach abroad?

History
1 answer:
Nikolay [14]3 years ago
5 0
Well that would likely hinder the trade for such nation, like China. China has a TON of industry, and what would happen of it couldn't reach outside its borders? The economy would plummet! It would weaken every aspect of the nation. 
You might be interested in
Of the questions below, which is the one that is the least likely to be an inherent issue in front of that audience (conservativ
Pachacha [2.7K]
Personally as a conservative libertarian I would go with B
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way did the Half-Way Covenant reflect the changes that were sweeping across New England at this time?
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

The Half-Way Covenant was created to provide a solution to the ever growing problem of how to regulate political participation and rights in a society that was based firmly on religion.

Explanation:

The New England Congregationalists in the 17th century, also known as the Puritans, had very strict rules regarding requirements for partaking in political positions and roles. One of the basic premises was that each citizen was accepted as long as they gave evidence of a “conversion experience”. This spiritual testimony was not questioned at first but as time passed and new generations grew up with different opinions on God, religion and society then the church had to be more flexible and adjust to this new mindset without forgetting God or the importance of the church as an institution.

This “Half-Way Covenent” reflected this new flexibility and adjustment, letting children of baptized but unconverted church members to be baptized and now have political rights and also become members of the church.

4 0
3 years ago
In what way did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 affect employment in the United States?
nydimaria [60]
It outlawed job discrimination 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which explains why the Compromise of 1850 intensified the argument about slavery?
dsp73
The equal division of slave an free states.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plea bargains can be helpful to defendants in criminal cases
creativ13 [48]

Hey There!! ⁓(⁄‣⁌‸‸⁍⁄‣)⁓

The answer to this is:

D. force the government to provide defendants with a  lawyer.

The trial penalty has made the government the most powerful player in the criminal justice system.

Although the defendantis cloaked in the presumption ofinnocence and the prosecutor theoretically

has the burden of proof, as the Report makes clear, the mere decision to charge triggers a domino

effect making a guilty plea the only rational choice in most cases. And as trials and hearings decline,

so too does government accountability. Government mistakes and misconduct are rarely uncovered,

or are simply resolved in a more favorable plea bargain.  

Moreover, the ease of conviction can

encourage sloppiness, and a diminution of the government’s obligation to fairness.

Defense counsel, whose role is to ensure that “all other rights of the accused are protected, spend

most of their time negotiating plea bargains and drafting sentencing memoranda. As a result of

the trial penalty, not only are defense counsel trying fewer cases, they are frequently forced to settle

cases before meaningful investigation and litigation of the government’s case.

The prevalence of guilty pleas sidelines judges from their traditional supervisory role. Rather than

scrutinizing the sufficiency and legality of the government’s case, they are reduced to rubberstamping plea bargains. If a mandatory minimum sentencing statute controls, judges do not even

exercise their traditional sentencing role.  

The decline in the number of trials, and the litigation that precedes them, also causes advocacy

skills to atrophy on both sides of the adversarial system. The federal courthouse in Manhattan,

for example, held only 50 trials in 2015. Many defense lawyers and prosecutors have not tried cases

in years, and many of the federal judges have similarly not presided over a trial in years.  

As one

judge summed up the impact of the vanishing trial: “The entire system loses an edge and . . . the

quality of justice in our courthouses has suffered as a result.

Hope It Helped!~

Hope This Explanation Help you.

And, Tell me if this answer is wrong...

And, Good Luck With Your Assignment!~

UsedLess⁓

(づ¨⁌⁔¨⁍)づ

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened to american industry after the civil war?
    12·1 answer
  • Because Henry Hudson did not find the northwest passage,
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a Social Darwinist argument in favor of Western imperialism? A. Westerners thought they had a duty to
    12·1 answer
  • Many immigrants left their homes and came to the United States in the 1800s because of economic hardship. religious intolerance.
    9·2 answers
  • People pay taxes for the government to provide
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Tesla Coil used for?
    8·1 answer
  • What does the Tao Te Ching teach?
    9·2 answers
  • MARKING BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT! HELP!
    9·1 answer
  • The Middle Passage refers to *
    12·1 answer
  • When did they stop using asbestos in popcorn ceilings.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!