Mostly likely no. He could've done more. If he had done more there probably wouldn't be a need for the civil rights act of 1964.
The correct answer that is being described in the statement
above is social constructionism. They are likely to be similar to the symbolic
interactionism and labeling theories. They are likely to be known as having
questions in which focuses more on the evolution and the origin of problems in
the society.
Answer:
The fact that a written constitution is difficult to amend is both an advantage and a disadvantage at the same time. Written constitution are mostly rigid, with cumbersome amendment procedure, which leads to the problem of how to easily amend it to make it suit changing needs and time.
Explanation:
CONSTITUTION IS the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or social group that determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the people in it. b : a written instrument embodying the rules of a political or social organization.
The purpose was to understand the formation of the Pluto system, the Kuiper belt, and the transformation of the early solar system!
By this statement, Tim wants to say that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.
<h3>Who are federal judges?</h3>
Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. They are nominated by the president and confirmed by the senate.
Tim means that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.
Therefore, A is the correct option.
Learn more about Federal judges here:
brainly.com/question/15877634
#SPJ1