The main difference is that the article suggests the murder was likely committed by robbers, while the excerpt suggests a wider range of suspects.
<h3>How can this difference be noticed?</h3>
- Through the reading of texts.
- By identifying the characterization of the killer.
- By comparing the diction between the texts.
- Through the purpose of each text.
With the reading of both texts, it is possible to see that the article tends to present the murder in a more objective and specific way, while the excerpt wants to show that the murder was more complex and with layers of difficult determination.
More information about diction at the link:
brainly.com/question/14571737
I believe it is narrative
Sophie is a girl who attends school in New York. She feels that she can solve an environmental issue involving the reefs. Sophie has been rejected by the professors at the school laboratory multiple times so she decided to set up her own lab at her house where she conducts research on the issue of the endangered species of the reef. On her way to give a presentation to the professors she freezes at the door and builds up enough courage to go in when her friend Sam walks her in. After Sophie presented her
notes, to her surprise the scientist’s applauded.
Answer: Figurative language is mostly used to leave a long lasting impression of something. Writers create images using figurative language so as to have us analyze and observe them in more detail. All of this is especially true of poets and poems who use metaphors, personification, and other narrative devices, so as to convey meaning almost all the time.
Explanation: I hope this helps
Answer:
povertyProcured:gainedMotives:reasonsMetamorphosis:change1In this great American asylum, the poor of Europe have by some meansmet together, and in consequence of various causes; to what purpose, should they ask oneanother, what countrymen they are? Alas, two thirds of them had no country. Can awretch who wanders about, who works and starves, whose life is a continual scene ofsore affliction or pinchingpenury; can that man call England or any other kingdom hiscountry? A country that had no bread for him, whose fieldsprocuredhim no harvest,who met with nothing but the frowns of the rich, the severity of the laws, with jails andpunishments; who owned not a single foot of the extensive surface of this planet? No!Urged by a variety ofmotives, here they came. Everything has tended to regeneratethem; new laws, a new mode of living, a new social system; here they are becomemen: in Europe they were as so many useless plants, wanting vegetative mould, andrefreshing showers; they withered, and were mowed down by want, hunger, ❤
