Is violence ever a good strategy for liberation? please explain why. i will mark brainliesttt

2 answers:

8 0

Violence is never a good strategy regardless of the situation. But specifically with liberation it’s a violence of itself because u are taking or limiting someone’s freedom or rights. Furthermore if u add physical abuse to that it only adds on to the abuse already given or injustice already given. So no violence is not a good strategy

Lynna [10]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

no it is not

Explanation:

it can lead to problems

You might be interested in

Why was the plan to allow students to go to schools closest to their own neighborhood ineffective in desegregating the schools?

Mrrafil [7]

Because shools became way too overpopulated. Some neighbourhood's are bigger then other others thus some schools had a lack of kids and some schools had too many kids.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did most Americans think the United States should extend to the Pacific Ocean?

emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

The farmers preferred to settle in the Northwest because they thought that the Great Plains were not suitable for agriculture. It was the belief that the United States should expand to the Pacific Ocean. ... As the population grew, Americans looked beyond the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

1. How did European colonialism affect Washington? (1 point)

brilliants [131]

Answer:

B. European countries claimed and fought over land already inhabited by Native Americans

3 0

2 years ago

While preparing for his travels to the Middle East, Waldo reads that the most common Physical Feature in the Middle East is trop

dybincka [34]

Actually it's false. Hope this helped mate!

7 0

3 years ago

The "Australian ballot" adopted in Great Britain in 1872 was __________.

qaws [65]

The "Australian ballot" adopted in Great Britain in 1872 was, "a form of a secret ballot in voting".

Have a wonderful day! :D

3 0

3 years ago