<span>Suppose the Fed doubles the growth rate of the quantity of money in the economy. In the long run, the increase in money growth will change which of the following? Check all that apply.
__ The price level
__ The inflation rate
Suppose the economy produces real GDP of $50 billion when unemployment is at its natural rate.
(graph goes here)
Suppose the government passes a law that reduces unemployment benefits in a way that causes unemployed workers to seek out new jobs more quickly. The policy will cause the natural rate of unemployment to (rise / fall) which will:
__ Shift the long-run aggregate supply curve to the left
Direction of LRAS Curve Shift:
Many workers leave to pursue more lucrative careers in foreign economies. (Left )
For environmental and safety reasons, the government requires that the country's nuclear (Left)
power plants be permanently shut down. (Left )
An investment tax credit increases the rate at which firms acquire machinery and equipment. (Right)</span>
JOBS ARE THE SOURCE OF INCOME
Answer:
Given these facts, which state would you expect the price of prostitution services to be higher? Why?
- Since the risks associated to prostitution are higher in New Jersey, we could assume that the price for these services will be higher there. The supply curve of prostitution shift to the left, increasing the price and decreasing the quantity.
Which state would have the higher amount of services consumed (adjusted for population differences)? Why? What are the underlying economic issues of this market?
- Since the price is higher in New Jersey, the quantity demanded will be lower. Also, the risks associated to consuming the service will shift the demand curve to the left, reducing the quantity.
E
I hope this helps and have a wonderful day filled with joy!!
<3
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
