Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
B- logos, which is the appeal of logic. Its definitely not pathos, witch is emotional appeal, or even ethos, which is ethical appeal
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What we have learned from Magellan voyage around the world is that Ferdinand Magellan was a Portuguese sailor that sailed the seas in many occasions and discovered important geographical features such as the Magellan Strait, the passage to the Pacific Ocean from the Atlantic, at the bottom of South America. Indeed, he was the first navigator to cross the Pacific Ocean.
During his explorations, he also discovered a route to the Spice Islands.
So we can conclude that Magellan's explorations added new knowledge about planet Earth in that he demonstrated that sailors could navigate the entire globe and that the planet was different than what Mediaeval times people thought.
Peter Griffin is a teacher
The author is trying to gain sorrow for the people in need of help so more will be able to help out. With this information I suggest the authors writing style would be persuasive.
