This is true <span>in the sense of cardinality. In the same sense that one can say that there are more real numbers than there are rationals (or integers; or natural numbers).</span><span>
source: </span>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/10333/are-there-many-more-irrational-numbers-than-rational
9514 1404 393
Answer:
it depends. 365.05 or 3.6505×10²
Step-by-step explanation:
In the US, 365.05 is already in standard form.
In the UK, "standard form" is the same as "scientific notation", so the number would be ...
3.6505×10²
Answer:
x = -24
Step-by-step explanation:
y = 1/4x+12 (Substitute 6 for y)
6 = 1/4x+12 (Subtract 12 from both sides)
6-12= -6 so its now -6 = 1/4x and since its a fraction you want to multiply both sides by the reciprocal
4*-6 = 1/4x*4 (1/4*4=1 which is 1x or x)
-24 = x
Answer:
n times 5 equals m
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer would be -1/12 .
2/3 - -3/4=-1/12
2/3=8/12
-3/4=-9/12
8/12- -9/12=-1/12
