Answer:
3.5%
Explanation:
We will apply asset pricing model to calculate cost of equity (required rate of return). The capital asset pricing model is stated as below:
Cost of equity = Risk-free rate + Beta x Market risk premium
Putting all the number together, we have:
Cost of equity (Beale) = 5.5% + 1.8 x (9% - 5.5%) = 11.8%
Cost of equity (Foley) = 5.5% + 0.8 x (9% - 5.5%) = 8.3%
Cost of equity (Beale) - Cost of equity (Foley) = 11.8% - 8.3% = 3.5%
<em />
<em>Note: You can also do quick calculation as below:</em>
<em>Cost of equity (Beale) - Cost of equity (Foley) = (Beta of Beale - Bete of Foley) x Market risk premium = (1.8 - 0.8) x (9% - 5.5%) = 3.5%</em>
Answer:
Owner owes Builder : B. $2,000.
Explanation:
A Liability is the present obligation of the entity, that arises as a result of past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in a cash outflow from the entity.
Initially, the Owners owes the Builder $,1500
For the fence to be completed on time, an addition of $500 was owed, upon the owner accepting this arrangement.
Thus, the total obligation owing to the Builder is $2,000.
Based on the amount paid for the tickets and their fair value, the portion that is entitled to <u>charitable contribution deduction</u> is $75.
When one buys a ticket to a charitable event, there is a chance that some of the ticket price can be treated as a charitable contribution deduction.
The part that can be treated as such is anything in excess of the fair value of the ticket. This amount in this case is:
= 200 - 125
= $75
In conclusion, the answer is $75.
Find out more on <u>charitable contribution deductions</u> at brainly.com/question/8706786.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Desses would have had a stronger argument if the contract was silent in this way because it would have been less likely that there was a designated class of third-party beneficiaries under the contract.
Cheers
