The answer is true because the racial caste system was the
one that replaced slavery in which this is a system where in it is responsible
for having to segregate the white and African American of which the whites are
considered to be marked as having high status even if they are poor and
uneducated.
In which defense do defendants affirm that they have reasonable grounds to believe that certain statements had no omission of material facts; Due diligence defense.
Any defendant except the issuer can assert this defense and it requires that the defendant demonstrate that she investigated the registration announcement and had reasonable grounds to believe that the registration statement become accurate and had no omission of material facts.
section 11 of the Securities Act imposes liability for underwriters, directors, and others involved with public security offerings. The statute also provides a due diligence defense for everyone, except the issuer.
Learn more about Due diligence defense here brainly.com/question/16036251
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. discounted movie tickets for senior citizens
E.with increased because the where will change the consumers with a higher level of demand a higher price
Explanation:
Sana makatulong
Military miscalculations and not national dry rot may have been the real answer. The French high command simply cannot recover from its mistakes in 1940 as it had a generation earlier.
Answer:
The correct answer is <em>c. the CISG (Contracts for the International Sale of Goods).</em>
Explanation:
Any international convention signed by two or more countries must contemplate the internal laws of each of the signatory countries. The convention gives a more specific legal framework on the aspects contemplated therein but cannot contradict the legal principles and parameters of the signatory countries.
In the specific case of a convention on the exchange of goods between companies in the United States and Argentina, companies belonging to both countries must carry out their operations of buying and selling products according to the legal principles and parameters established in such regulations.
In the event that one of the companies or one of the National States understood that the requirements set forth in the convention are not being met, it must establish the legal claims before the agency that the convention would have arranged for the arbitration of such situation. This body could be an international court, a binational court, a court of a third country, a court belonging to one of both countries, etc.
An important dispute recently occurred between the Argentine State and Companies based in the United States over a Sovereign Debt issue. The North American companies owned debt bonds of the Argentine national State.
As in this case it had been previously signed that any dispute would be resolved in a New York court, so it happened and the Argentine government had to accept the opinion of Judge Griesa, of New York, paying off the debt and allowing the country to leave the default in which he was previously. This is a clear example of how to proceed in situations of international legal order based on the signing of a previous treaty.
