Answer:
1. It should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. There are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but I can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.
2. Yes. First, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. The pros involve better medical treatment. The cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. Looking at DNA markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. And OK, actually I suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency.
Brainliest pleaseeeee??
Helps reduce the chances of developing chronic diseases that can last a lifetime,also can improve the quality of your life.
Answer:
Hurricanes will become more frequent and expand to new areas.
Explanation:
Global warming will rise sea temperatures worldwide. This means conditions for hurricanes will be met more often (they only form in higher than average sea temperatures). That means more hurricanes will form in the future. Also because of rising sea temperatures new areas will be effected by hurricanes as they will meet the threshold required for hurricanes to form.
<span>The most basic universal indicators of human development are life expectancy, literacy, and standard of living. Only health would not be considered as part of these indicators, because it doesn't say anything about human development. Life expectancy refers to the length of someone's life. Literacy is the state of being literate, meaning knowing how to read and write. Standard of living is self-explanatory - whether you live good and have money or the opposite.</span>
The nurse should wait for the patient to be diagnosed before giving them any sort of painkiller. This is because the painkiller could react badly with the patient. they could be allergic to something in it or it could make the patient's condition worse. This might not be what you are looking for but it is what my dad taught me. Never give a patient anything until you know what is wrong with them. He is an ex-paramedic.
