Not being able to do something because of the time and resource and the thing you already did.
It's a <span>partnership. I have to write more words but that's what that arrangement is.</span>
Answer:
A) $560 million
Explanation:
First lets calculate the NPV of the cash stream by this investment,
PV Cash stream = Cash flow/ (r-g), where r = avg cost of capital and g = growth of the cash stream.
PV = 50 / (0.09 - 0.04) = $1000 million
We assume that external finance issuance costs are payable as a part of initial outlay of the project and so,
Total initial outlay = 420 + 20 = $440 million
NPV of the project then,
NPV = 1000 - 440 = $560 million
Hope that helps.
Original Source Material
Student Version
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Several factors can contribute to long-term organizational success. One is the establishment of a core ideology that Collins and Porras (2002) describe as "core values and sense of purpose beyond just making money" (p. 48). Also, the importance of a visionary leader that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time is hard to over emphasize.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
This is not plagiarism.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Plagiarism in very simple words is the copying of the content of the document that has been written by some one else in to your own document. During this copying the due acknowledgement is also not given to the document from which it has been taken.
The document that has been talked about in the question above is not an example of plagiarism. The proof for this is the due acknowledgement given to the references from whose document the content has been taken into the document.
You look like you seem fun to hang around!
