Answer: State limited liability company statutes vary from state to state.
Explanation:
States are able to pass their own laws regarding the treatment of certain things within a state and limited liability companies are one of them.
The states have different corporate values and therefore will pass different laws to treat limited liability companies based on these values. These laws and statutes will therefore by extension, vary just as the values vary.
For this reason, the law governing LLCs in the different states is not uniform.
Answer:
The first mover that creates a revolutionary product is in a monopoly position.
Explanation:
First Mover is the big initiator of a new product, which gains a competitive 'first mover advantage' for being the pioneer of the idea in the market.
- The first mover can be able to establish brand loyalty
- Being a first mover doesn't guarantee instant success
- The first mover can create switching costs for its customers to deter rivals.
The only apt statement is : The first mover that creates a revolutionary product is in a monopoly position. The first mover enters the market when there is no major supplier & the customer's demand is unmet. If it enables to leverage the potential huge unsatisfied market in a revolutionary way, it can be able to create unparalleled brand loyalty. And this can make it secure monopoly position in market
brand mark, it is one of the most well known brand marks
In this case it is a realistic view of the work. The manager makes it clear what the company intends with the employee. She explains that employment can offer good chances for professional growth, but also makes it clear that this will happen due to employee performance and consistent work. It is a realistic view of the job by presenting the benefits and duties of the employee.
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
