Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because its better u save 0.3*10=3 dollars but I value my time for $5 for that half an hour and hence its better not to go considering opportunity cost.
If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Answer:
<u>Zone of tolerance</u>
Explanation:
Zone of tolerance with respect to a service refers to, the acceptable range to a customer, that lies between the perceived desired level of service expected and the minimum level of service acceptable.
The service which the customer anticipates or expects to be delivered by a firm is referred to as predicted service.
Customer expectations do not depict a single level of expectation, rather they follows a range of expectations. This range is represented as zone of tolerance.
If the service received lies in the zone of tolerance, the customer would be satisfied. If it is higher than the desired level, the customer would consider it exceptional.
In case the service received falls below the minimum level of acceptance, the customer would be disappointed and feel deceived or tricked.
Answer:
The company should buy from an outside source rahter than manufacturing because each bottle manufactured costs $5 more.
Explanation:
Differential Analysis
Make Buy
Manufacturing Cost per bottle $ 67
Purchasing Cost per bottle $35
Freight per bottle $ 5
<u>Fixed Costs $ 22 </u>
<u>Total $ 67 $62 </u>
<u />
The company should buy the bottles from the outside source because the manufacturing costs are higher than the purchasing costs and the fixed costs.
The fixed costs are the irrelevant costs that will continue whether bottles are manufactured or purchased.
Answer:
b. diminishing returns to specialization.
Explanation:
Diminishing returns is also called diminishing productivity. It states that as additional unit of input is used in production it will get to a stage where more of input will be required to maintain output levels.
If the same level of input is used it will result in reduction in output over time.
This is exemplified in this secanrio where it takes 10 units of resources to increase its output of sugar from 12 tons to 13 tons, but 11 units of resources to increase output from 13 tons to 14 tons, and 12 units of resources to increase output from 14 tons and 15 tons.
It takes more input to increase output by 1 ton