Answer:
(a) 10.4%; 16.73%
(b) 6.33%
Explanation:
Given that,
Wages paid to the workers in 2016 = $25 per hour
Price level in 2016 = 241
Wages paid to the workers in 2017 = $41 per hour
Price level in 2017 = 245
Real wage rate in 2016:
= (Nominal wages ÷ Price level) × 100
= ($25 ÷ 241) × 100
= 0.104 × 100
= 10.4%
Real wage rate in 2017:
= (Nominal wages ÷ Price level) × 100
= ($41 ÷ 245) × 100
= 0.1673 × 100
= 16.73%
Therefore, the real wage increase received by these workers in 2017 is calculated as follows:
= Real wage rate in 2017 - Real wage rate in 2016
= 16.73% - 10.4%
= 6.33%
Hence, these workers do get a raise between the two years.
Answer:
mining
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the industry that managed to accomplish this was the mining industry. This industry was the main push on bringing the west into the global economy, as the west mined precious metals such as gold which since there is only a fixed amount it is considered a very valuable commodity which would give those who had it a large capital. Also in order to mine the gold and other precious metals the companies needed a large number or laborers.
Answer:
The dividend growth rate is 8%.
Explanation:
Considering the stock is the one that has a constant dividend growth, we use the DDM approach for constant growth model. The constant growth model formula for price of a stock today is,
P0 = D1 / r - g
Where,
- D1 is the dividend in the next period or D0 * (1 + g)
- r is the required rate of return
- g is the growth rate in dividends
Plugging in the available value,
30 = 1.25 ( 1+g) / (0.125 - g)
30 * (0.125 - g) = 1.25 + 1.25g
3.75 - 30g = 1.25 + 1.25g
3.75 - 1.25 = 30g + 1.25g
2.5 / 31.25 = g
g = 0.08 or 8%
I am not Sure What the question is explain a little better
Answer:
Chesterly used to provide special deals to company customers and used to receive bribery from these customer in return.
Explanation:
The company products and services were sold by Chesterly to its customers at a discounted price because both the Chesterly and its customer had agreed that Chesterly will receive a share of return from its customers. This was against the fiduciary duty of Directors and resulted in loss of profits to company which was not in the best interests of shareholders or in other words the director Chesterly committed fraud.
