Answer:
Explanation:
Commutative laws: p ∧ q ≡ q ∧ p
p ∨ q ≡ q ∨ p
Associative laws: (p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
(p ∨ q) ∨ r ≡ p ∨ (q ∨ r)
Distributive laws: p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Identity laws: p ∧ t ≡ p
p ∨ c ≡ p
Negation laws: p ∨ ∼p ≡ t
p ∧ ∼p ≡ c
Double negative law: ∼(∼p) ≡ p
Idempotent laws: p ∧ p ≡ p
p ∨ p ≡ p
Universal bound laws: p ∨ t ≡ t
p ∧ c ≡ c
De Morgan’s laws: ∼(p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p ∨ ∼q
∼(p ∨ q) ≡ ∼p ∧ ∼q
Absorption laws: p ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p
p ∧ (p ∨ q) ≡ p
Negations of t and c: ∼t ≡ c
∼c ≡ t
Answer:
I think You Mistakes the Word Of Flirt to Flood!!
Explanation:
Hahahh
Answer:
The aswer is A, rescind.
Explanation:
Contract rescission refers to the termination or cancellation of a contract. It is sometimes called “cancellation” or “overturning”. The word rescission comes from the word “rescind” which means to cancel or annul. The purpose of contract rescission is to restore the parties to their original status before the contract was made (the “status quo ante”).
Contracts must be rescinded entirely; that is, the entire contract must be cancelled, not just one part. If only a portion of the contract is to be cancelled, this is usually accomplished under contract reformation laws, not rescission laws. Rescission is often available as a remedy in cases where there are issues with the way that the contract was formed.
Income inequality in the United States has increased significantly since the 1970s after several decades of stability, meaning the share of the nation's income received by higher income households has increased. This trend is evident with income measured both before taxes (market income) as well as after taxes and transfer payments. Income inequality has fluctuated considerably since measurements began around 1915, moving in an arc between peaks in the 1920s and 2000s, with a 30-year period of relatively lower inequality between 1950–1980