1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
6

Greg reasons "I can't cheat. I need a good grade but knowledge is the most important thing. I must try." Which philosophy best d

epicts Greg's reasoning?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mars2501 [29]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Kantian Ethics

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

  • Egoism
  • Act utility
  • Rule utility
  • Kantian Ethics

In this example, Greg is employing Kantian ethics to deal with this question. Kantian ethics are an example of a deontological moral theory. This means that an act is wrong or right not based on the consequence of the act, but based on whether this act fulfills our duty or not. In this example, Greg argues that he "must try." This is the duty he has to fulfill. Therefore, the way in which he thinks about morality is based on duties, and whether these apply to him or not.

You might be interested in
What is the correct way to handle a bucket of dirty mop water?
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

Dump it out outside.

Explanation:

rap mosta from bts be like

3 0
3 years ago
A strong attachment is important most for:
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
9<br> Why doesn't sexual reproduction produce identical offspring?
Aloiza [94]

Answer/Explanation:

Sexual reproduction is a a combination of chromosomes from each mate. Since each mate has different pairs, when combined they produce a completely different product.

This product has half of the characteristics from both sides.

Below is an example of how this works. The bold cells are from one mate and the other is from the other.

X     --->    ><    <---   X

X     --->    ><    <---   X

X     --->    ><    <---   X

X     --->    ><    <---   X

X     --->    ><    <---   X

As shown, the cells broke in half and combined with the other half forming a cell of 50/50. With this process it never created an identical offspring but different ones each time since different parts of the cell combines in different ways but still remains half of one and half of the other.

3 0
3 years ago
Imagine an officer approaches a group of students for being at a public park after curfew. The officer arrests one teen who was
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.

That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.

The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how companies engage in price competition and non-competition and give and example of each kind of competition
baherus [9]

Answer:

Explanation: irms will engage in non-price competition, in spite of the additional costs involved, because it is usually more profitable than selling for a lower price and avoids the risk of a price war. For example, brand-name goods often sell more units than do their generic counterparts, despite usually being more expensive. i hope this was helpful to u

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements best explains why urban centers grew during the Industrial Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • Confusing a new phone number with an old one is an example of retroactive interference <br><br> T/F
    8·1 answer
  • What changes were necessary in Earth’s atmosphere to allow complex organisms to evolve?
    8·2 answers
  • In an experiment, two groups of dogs are given shocks to their feet. one group is able to escape the shocks by jumping over a ba
    12·1 answer
  • Help me plz ☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
    15·2 answers
  • What was the primary cause of conflict between steppe nomads and settled communities
    6·1 answer
  • What are some social disadvantages to Sustainable cotton
    9·1 answer
  • The graph shows the effect of air pressure on the distance that a soccer ball travels. Look at it closely. How far
    7·1 answer
  • Lucy has previously said that she thinks it is wrong of people to cheat on their homework. However during finals week she was ex
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement do you agree with and why? *
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!