Hello. You didn't say which genocide you're referring to. However, genocides start because of ethnic, national, racial, religious and even political prejudices, the people involved in this practice, are authoritarian people and regardless of differences. To prevent the genocide, people can adopt measures that encourage the acceptance of differences between citizens, in addition to choosing their political representatives who do not encourage prejudiced and violent terms and behavior.
The international community can prevent genocides by paying attention to authoritarian, theocratic, ultra-nationalist governments that exhibit any type of harmful behavior. In addition, the international community can establish institutions that promote integration between people of races, ethnicities and religious. We cannot fail to mention that the international community must act in order to ban any hate speech proclaimed by leaders, in addition to harsh repressions for governments that incite genocide.
The Pilgrims and the Puritans established colonies in the New World to practice their religions freely.
The Pilgrim Fathers was an English religious group formed in the late sixteenth century that, being dissatisfied with the political-religious environment in their country, decided to emigrate to the New World in 1620.
The Pilgrim Fathers left the port of Plymouth (England) on the Mayflower ship on August 15, 1620 and, crossing the Atlantic Ocean, intended to reach the Jamestown colony -founded in 1607- but strong storms prevented it by pushing about 800 km further north, to Cape Cod, where they arrived on November 9 of the same year. Shortly after they founded Plymouth that would be the capital of the homonymous colony, which existed until 1691, year in which it was united with the Colony of the bay of Massachusetts forming the Province of the Bay of Massachusetts.
The Pilgrim Fathers were gathered together by the Calvinist puritanical church and took refuge from religious persecutions and from the political instability that existed in Europe.
Schools only really tell the white people side of the story in all the historical events which is a reason why they don't really go in depth as they do for slavery.
Answer:
This is keeping in form with a form of politics known as "Participatory politics".
Explanation:
Participatory politics issues or parpolity is a hypothetical political framework proposed by Stephen Shalom, educator of political theory at William Paterson College in New Jersey.
It was created as a political vision to go with participatory financial matters (parecon). Both parecon and parpolity together make up the libertarian communist belief system of participism; this has essentially educated the Universal Association for a Participatory Society. Shalom has expressed that parpolity is implied as a long-run vision of where the social equity development should wind up inside the field of legislative issues.
The qualities on which parpolity is based are opportunity, self-administration, equity, solidarity, and resistance. The objective, as indicated by Shalom, is to make a political framework that will permit individuals to take an interest however much as could be expected in an up close and personal way. The proposed dynamic guideline is that each individual ought to have say in a choice proportionate to how much she or he is influenced by that choice.
The vision is condemning of parts of current agent popular governments contending that the degree of political control by the individuals isn't adequate. To address this issue parpolity recommends an arrangement of "settled gatherings", which would incorporate each grown-up individual from a given society.
Could you give more information? what are the examples
