Hmm....
This is straight from my own Memory but which Catherine the Great was it?
If it is the second one, then I would Say either C or D
(Sorry Im too lazy to search up :v)
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option a==> yellow-dog contracts.
Explanation:
In the United States of America, there was a period( 1920s and early 1930s) that in order to secure a job, the employees has to come into aggreement with the employers that they will never form or join any union relating to labour. This case was very rampant in the public sector of the economy in which people seeking for work has to give up their rights to protest for unjustice ( for example teachers during those times were not to join any labour union).
The reason behind yellow-dog contracts is to make sure that employers are able to stop workers from protesting.
Therefore, we can see from the Explanation above that Rosedale Shoe Factory was making use of yellow-dog contracts.
