The answer is definitely C
In 2014 plagiarism detection can seem like a purely technological affair. Between amazing technologies to detect text, images, audio and video copying, it seems like anyone should be able to put a work through a supercomputer and learn whether or not it’s plagiarized.
However, human intuition and instinct still play as big of a role as technology in spotting plagiarism.
Part of this is because, despite how far technology has advanced, there are still types of plagiarism that computers can’t spot. However, even in cases where plagiarism can be detected by a machine, there’s often too much content to feed everything into the available tools. As such, having a good idea on what to check can be very useful.
So what are some of the signs that a work might have a plagiarism issue? There are actually dozens of potential tip offs and we discussed three common ones in academic environments in 2011.
However, here are five potential red flags that you can look for when checking out a piece of text. Though these aren’t outright convictions of plagiarism, they might make a work worth a deeper look.
Answer:
reword, answer, cite, explain, and summarize
Explanation:
It's a writng strategy, sort of like for a rhetorical analysis essay:
Claim: what is the author of the text saying
Evidence: back it up with quotes/phrases from the text
Analysis: explain the quote and what you think the author's trying to say
For RACES, it'd be:
Restate the question (i think....)
Answer it (I think... because)
cite (from the given passage....)
explain (how does it all fit together? this is one of the most important parts of the strategy)
summarize (conclusion; not as important)
Hope this helps, and please mark me brainliest if it does!
Answer: C
Explanation:
Circle the first and last sentences of each paragraph
It is a book about botany/environment.
