Answer:
It's demeaning
Explanation:
Bill O'Reiley was suggesting on his show that there are specific classes that are already categorized as upper lower and middle in the UK and India. He based the formation of a formation of an underclass by polling Americans and realizing that 57% of them are doing badly financially and the state of the economy was most concerning to them. The most poignant of facts is that the education system which is the second highest investment in the world but the students are performing poorly on tests anyway.
Conspiracy theorists claim that the minority students are being treated differently by a group in advocate of education, PEG. The minorities are made to believe that they are entitled and do not need to obey rules as the white children do. For this reason, an "underclass" is being created since minority children in school are not being held to the higher standard as the white children are.
This of course, is only his opinion, and the reason for creating such an, "underclass" is multifaceted and not from a single cause. On the other hand, referring to a group of people as "underclass" is demeaning and derogatory to say the least.
The god of the incas was the sun. There's even a festival dedicated to it.
Because if it is not used wisely, these resources might not be available for future generations.
Answer:
12 states serve two-year terms
Explanation:
2-4-4 term system. ;)
Answer:
having half the swimmers first swim without fins and then with fins and having the other half swim first with fins and then without fins.
Explanation:
counterbalanced repeated measures is methodology of experimentation in which sample for experiment is divided into two parts equally. The first follows the condition of experiment in one series of step while other part follows the steps precisely opposite to that of first part. The objective of such methodology is to cover each condition of experimentation and nullify any error condition for every sample. It also makes sure that in series of steps, sequence does not affect the result.
Since in the above experiment Powel wants to counterbalancing first he needs to divide the sample of swimmer into two parts. Then both parts should follows opposite steps.
This can be best followed by
in first half sample
- test the speed of swimmer without fins
- then test the speed same set of swimmer without fin
- then see the discrepancy in the speed
second half sample
- test the speed of simmers with fins
- test their speed without fins.
- see the discrepancy in the speed
then compare the results of both set of sample. It will make sure that both half corroborate the same result, also sequence of with and without fins does not effect the result and produce biased result.
based on this option 3 is correct answer.
