Alternative explanation for the observed results - The conclusion section of a research poster or report basically contains a summary of the design and testing and analyzes the observed results. If the observed results do not meet the design criteria, then an alternative explanation is given as to why it failed to give the desired result.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Banks don't file taxes, a tax prelesional like a CPA does that
Spend more time with family.Happiness is the best medicine for events like that
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Jonas’s friend that confused snack with snack was Asher.
