Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Each state has two senators, while the House of Representatives is based on the districts within each state. This is determined based on Gerrymandering where there is different districts drawn in each state. The answer would be based on how many districts each state has
Answer: the answer is Regulatory pillar
Explanation:
Quizle Romila ensures that she pays taxes out of fear that she might be caught and sent to prison for evading taxes. The given example shows the influence of regulatory pillar on people’s behavior.
The regulatory pillar is the forceful power of the government exercised through laws,regulations and rules.
Romila was influenced by the mentality of been prosecuted if she avoids paying of taxes
He vigorously promoted the conservation movement, emphasizing efficient use of natural resources. He dramatically expanded the system of national parks and national forests.
