To limit the potential for war and other armed conflict, efforts by international bodies must be increased, particularly at United Nations well-known organization.
Many conflicts since the 1990s have been resolved either through UN mediation or through the action of third parties acting with UN support. Examples from the recent past include Nepal, Liberia, Burundi, the Sudan's north-south conflict, and Sierra Leone. A 40% decrease in conflict worldwide since the 1990s is attributed to UN peacemaking, peacekeeping, and conflict prevention activities, according to research. Many potential conflicts have been avoided through preventive action taken by the UN and other organizations. On the ground, 11 UN peace missions deal with post-conflict situations and implement peacebuilding strategies.
In about 30 nations or territories, the UN provides assistance in demining, including in Afghanistan, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Libya, and the Sudan. Thousands of civilians are killed or injured each year by landmines. The UN also promotes full international participation in treaties relating to landmines and provides instruction on how to avoid danger, aids victims in becoming self-sufficient, and helps nations destroy stockpiled landmines.
Learn more about United Nation (UN), here
brainly.com/question/9763405
#SPJ4
The answer is E. i might be wrong
Answer:
C. A situation where no economic agent would benefit by changing his or her behavior
Explanation:
An economic equilibrium is when the agents are optimizing their decisions and opposing market forces are equal. This point allows the economic agents to maximize their utility and any change from this point will cause all agents to move away from potential maximum benefits.
In a natural equilibrium there is usually no government intervention so option A is false. Option B gives only one agent potential benefits and as such there is no equilibrium. Option D is conditional and may or may not happen as when the agents find missing information they would optimize again and move to an equilibrium.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
C) Atlanta Company
Explanation:
Let's bear in mind that equity is an advantage that allows your company to buy and sell more.
So more equity means more ability to buy and sell and less the possibility of going bankrupt.
Liability on the other hand also gives advantage in trade r company , so more liability shows strongness of the company.
Now let's compare the equity and liability of the both companies
Atlanta Company
Total liabilities $ 429,000
Total equity 572,000
Spokane Company
Total liabilities $ 549,000
Total equity 1,830,000
The equity ratio is about 1:3
While liability is about 1:1.2
So Atlanta company has more riskier structure
